Lexploria - Legal research enhanced by smart algorithms
Lexploria beta Legal research enhanced by smart algorithms
Menu
Browsing history:

IVANOVÁ v. SLOVAKIA

Doc ref: 40478/22 • ECHR ID: 001-225264

Document date: May 15, 2023

  • Inbound citations: 0
  • Cited paragraphs: 0
  • Outbound citations: 0

IVANOVÁ v. SLOVAKIA

Doc ref: 40478/22 • ECHR ID: 001-225264

Document date: May 15, 2023

Cited paragraphs only

Published on 5 June 2023

FIRST SECTION

Application no. 40478/22 Lenka IVANOVÁ against Slovakia lodged on 16 August 2022 communicated on 15 May 2023

SUBJECT MATTER OF THE CASE

The application concerns the freezing of the applicant’s entire property in the framework of criminal proceedings initiated against her and two other persons for breach of duty in administration of another’s property and for money laundering. The applicant unsuccessfully requested that the scope of the freezing be reduced. The criminal proceedings are still ongoing.

Relying on Article 1 of Protocol No. 1 to the Convention, as well as Article 6 of the Convention, the applicant claims that the freezing order was disproportionate to the aim pursued, disabling her to take daily care of her family including two minor children.

QUESTIONS TO THE PARTIES

1. Has there been an interference with the applicant’s peaceful enjoyment of possessions, within the meaning of Article 1 of Protocol No. 1 on account of the freezing of her assets?

2. If so, was that interference lawful? In particular, was the applicable legislation sufficiently precise regarding the conditions for freezing?

3. Was the interference carried out in pursuance of a legitimate aim by means proportionate to the aim sought to be realised or did the interference impose an excessive individual burden on the applicant? In particular, did the domestic authorities assess whether there was a link between the applicant’s assets frozen and the criminal offences for which she was prosecuted?

4. In this context, did the domestic authorities have the possibility to limit the freezing of the applicant’s property to a certain amount or did they have no choice but to freeze the entirety of her property?

© European Union, https://eur-lex.europa.eu, 1998 - 2025

LEXI

Lexploria AI Legal Assistant

Active Products: EUCJ + ECHR Data Package + Citation Analytics • Documents in DB: 400211 • Paragraphs parsed: 44892118 • Citations processed 3448707