CASE OF ANCA AND OTHERS AGAINST ROMANIA AND 26 OTHER CASES
Doc ref: 45653/13, 56513/13, 75874/13, 76774/13, 16979/14, 18518/14, 18621/14, 30310/14, 46831/14, 57831/13, ... • ECHR ID: 001-223774
Document date: March 9, 2023
- 5 Inbound citations:
- •
- 0 Cited paragraphs:
- •
- 0 Outbound citations:
Resolution CM/ResDH(2023)34
Execution of the judgments of the European Court of Human Rights
Twenty-seven cases against Romania
(Adopted by the Committee of Ministers on 9 March 2023 at the 1459 th meeting of the Ministers’ Deputies)
Application No.
Case
Judgment of
Final on
45653/13
ANCA AND OTHERS
14/12/2017
14/12/2017
46831/14
BOLDIJAR AND OTHERS
29/03/2018
29/03/2018
57831/13+
CHIRIAC AND OTHERS
03/03/2016
03/03/2016
54609/15+
CLOÅžCÄ‚ AND OTHERS
08/10/2020
08/10/2020
48624/16+
COVACI AND OTHERS
02/12/2021
02/12/2021
66551/14+
DUMITRESCU AND OTHERS
26/07/2018
26/07/2018
15549/16
GEORGE-LAVINIU GHIURĂU
16/06/2020
16/09/2020
983/16+
HANYECZ AND OTHERS
12/07/2018
12/07/2018
35486/15+
IVAN AND OTHERS
26/07/2018
26/07/2018
39523/13
MAIER
16/03/2021
16/03/2021
18270/14+
MARINAȘ AND OTHERS
03/05/2018
03/05/2018
32435/13+
MATEI AND OTHERS
07/04/2016
12/10/2017 (revision)
07/04/2016
12/10/2017 (revision)
31539/16+
MIHAI AND OTHERS
10/02/2022
10/02/2022
11220/14
MIHĂILESCU
14/02/2017
14/02/2017
32002/15
MIHĂILESCU
03/12/2019
03/12/2019
46546/12
MIHĂILESCU
01/07/2014
01/10/2014
72608/14
MIHĂILESCU
24/09/2019
24/09/2019
76888/13
MOCANU
17/03/2022
17/03/2022
44554/13+
NICULA AND OTHERS
03/05/2018
03/05/2018
11950/16+
PAVEL AND OTHERS
10/12/2020
28/10/2021 (revision)
10/12/2020
28/10/2021 (revision)
38238/13+
PLETOSU-HALUNGESCU AND OTHERS
03/05/2018
03/05/2018
37772/17
POTOROC
02/06/2020
02/09/2020
12656/14
RĂDULESCU AND OTHERS
08/02/2018
08/02/2018
26075/16
ROTARU
30/08/2022
30/08/2022
67616/16+
RUSETI AND OTHERS
16/12/2021
16/12/2021
27855/17+
SANDU AND OTHERS
16/12/2021
16/12/2021
905/15
TOPOR AND OTHERS
30/07/2020
30/07/2020
The Committee of Ministers, under the terms of Article 46, paragraph 2, of the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms, which provides that the Committee supervises the execution of final judgments of the European Court of Human Rights (hereinafter “the Convention†and “the Courtâ€,
Having regard to the final judgments transmitted by the Court to the Committee in these cases and to the violations of Article 3 of the Convention established on account of overcrowding, poor material conditions and deficiencies in the provision of healthcare in detention or of personal assistance to prisoners with disabilities;
Recalling the respondent State’s obligation, under Article 46, paragraph 1, of the Convention, to abide by all final judgments in cases to which it has been a party and that this obligation entails, over and above the payment of any sums awarded by the Court, the adoption by the authorities of the respondent State, where required:
- of individual measures to put an end to violations established and erase their consequences so as to achieve as far as possible restitutio in integrum ; and
- of general measures preventing similar violations;
Having invited the government of the respondent State to inform the Committee of the measures taken to comply with the above-mentioned obligation;
Having examined the information provided by the government indicating the individual measures adopted to give effect to the judgments (see document DH-DD(2022)1288 ) and the information provided regarding the payment of the just satisfaction awarded by the Court;
Noting that all the applicants have ceased serving their prison sentence, and that the just satisfaction, where awarded by the Court, was paid, and considering therefore that no further individual measures are required in these cases;
Recalling that the general measures required to guarantee non-repetition of the violations of Article 3 continue to be examined within the framework of the Bragadireanu v. Romania group of cases and that the closure of these cases therefore in no way prejudges the Committee’s evaluation of these measures;
DECLARES that it has exercised its functions under Article 46, paragraph 2, of the Convention in these cases and
DECIDES to close the examination of these cases.