Published on 2 October 2023

FOURTH SECTION

Application no. 25187/15 Sergey Vladimirovich LUTSEVICH against Russia and 35 other applications

(see list appended)

PROCEDURAL INFORMATION

Following a preliminary examination of the admissibility of the applications on 7 September 2023, the Court decided, under Rule 54 § 2 (b) of the Rules of Court, that notice of the applications should be given to the Government of Russia.

In the applications marked by an asterisk, other complaints were raised. This part of the applications has been struck out of the Court’s list of cases or declared inadmissible by the Court, sitting in a single-judge formation, assisted by a rapporteur as provided for in Article 24 § 2 of the Convention.

In the enclosed list of applications, whenever an applicant is referred to using initials, this indicates that the Court has authorised anonymity for that person, whose identity will not be disclosed to the public (Rule 47 § 4).

For further information on the procedure following communication of an application brought against Russia, subject of well-established case law of the Court, please refer to the Court’s website .

SUBJECT MATTER

The applications concern complaints raised under Article 11 of the Convention relating to disproportionate measures against organisers and participants of public assemblies which are the subject of well-established case law of the Court (see Frumkin v. Russia, no. 74568/12, ECHR 2016 (extracts); Navalnyy and Yashin v. Russia, no. 76204/11, 4 December 2014; and Kasparov and Others v. Russia, no. 21613/07, 3 October 2013).

APPENDIX – STATEMENT OF FACTS

List of applications raising complaints under Article 11 of the Convention (disproportionate measures against organisers and participants of public assemblies)

No.

Application no.

Date of introduction

Applicant’s name

Year of birth/registration

Representative’s name and location

Name of the public event

Location

Date

Administrative charges

Penalty

Final domestic decision

Court Name

Date

Other complaints under well-established case-law

25187/15*

12/05/2015

Sergey Vladimirovich LUTSEVICH

1976Demonstration in support of the media channel "Dozhd"

Moscow

08/02/2014

article 20.2 § 5 of CAO

fine of RUB 10,000

Moscow City Court

12/11/2014

Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings

19779/20*

23/03/2020

Zinaida Aleksandrovna GILYAZOVA

1989Yevgeniy Vyacheslavovich Antokhin

Moscow

Anti-war manifestation

Moscow

06/03/2022

article 20.2 § 5 of CAO

fine of RUB 10,000

Moscow City Court

07/09/2022

Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings – final decisions by the Moscow City Court on 26/09/2019 (participation in an unauthorised manifestation on 10/08/2019, fine of RUB 10,000, article 20.2 § 5 of CAO) and by the Moscow City Court on 07/09/2022;

Art. 5 (1) - unlawful deprivation of liberty - arrest and detention on 10/08/2019 from 5.40 p.m. to 1 a.m. on 11/08/2019- Detention as an administrative suspect: beyond the three-hour statutory period (Art. 27.5(1)-(4) CAO) (see Tsvetkova and Others v. Russia, nos. 54381/08 and 5 others, §§ 121-22, 10 April 2018);

arrest and detention on 06/03/2022 - Applicant taken to the police station as an administrative suspect: no evidence/assessment that it was impracticable, on the spot, to compile the offence record (Art. 27.2 § 1 CAO) and achieve the objectives set out in Art. 27.1 CAO, e.g. to establish the suspect’s identity (see Korneyeva v. Russia, no. 72051/17, § 34, 8 October 2019; Ryabinina and Others v. Russia [Committee], nos. 50271/06 and 8 other applications, § 35, 2 July 2019) (both complaints raised in the respective proceedings)

13723/21*

10/02/2021

Ruslan Mansurovich ZINATULLIN

1978Participation in the Municipal Russia Forum organised by the Open Russia public association

Moscow

13/03/2021

article 20.33 of CAO

fine of RUB 5,000

Vakhitovskiy District Court of Kazan

01/07/2021

Art. 5 (1) - unlawful deprivation of liberty - The applicant was arrested on 03/06/2020 in connection with the solo picket the applicant held on 15/05/2020 - Applicant was taken to the police station as an administrative suspect: no evidence/assessment that it was impracticable, on the spot, to compile the offence record (Art. 27.2 § 1 CAO) and achieve the objectives set out in Art. 27.1 CAO, e.g. to establish the suspect’s identity (see Korneyeva v. Russia, no. 72051/17, § 34, 8 October 2019; Ryabinina and Others v. Russia [Committee], nos. 50271/06 and 8 other applications, § 35, 2 July 2019) (the complaint raised on appeal in the administrative-offence proceedings),

Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings - in relation to administrative proceedings which ended with the final decision on 16/09/2020,

Art. 11 (1) - restrictions on location, time or manner of conduct of public events - The applicant complained of the authorities’ refusal to approve a manifestation in support of victims of political repressions on 02/11/2019 in Kazan. On 18/10/2019 the applicant notified the authorities of his wish to hold that event, however, the authorities proposed to change the location because another event had already been planned there. The final decision was taken by the Supreme Court of the Russian Federation on 07/04/2021, complaint lodged on 06/10/2021,

Art. 10 (1) - disproportionate measures against solo demonstrators - Kazan, Military Commissariat, 15/05/2020, Solo Picket against mandatory military service (conscription); Article 20.2 § 1 of CAO; penalty: 30 hours’ community service; final decision taken by the Supreme Court of the Tatarstan Republic on 16/09/2020

16050/21*

05/03/2021

Yevgeniy Vadimovich DILMAN

2001Memorial Human Rights Centre

Moscow

Manifestation in support of S. Furgal

Komsomolsk-on-Amur

29/07/2020

article 20.2 § 5 of CAO

fine of RUB 10,000

Khabarovsk Regional Court

07/12/2020

21993/21*

07/04/2021

Yevgeniy Konstantinovich KOSTOMAROV

1989Memorial Human Rights Centre

Moscow

Manifestation in support of A. Navalnyy ("Otpuskai")

Moscow

02/02/2021

article 20.2 § 6.1 of CAO

administrative detention 12 days

Moscow City Court

09/02/2021

Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings,

Art. 5 (1) - unlawful deprivation of liberty - arrest and detention on 02-03/02/2021 - Applicant was taken to the police station as an administrative suspect: no evidence/assessment that it was impracticable, on the spot, to compile the offence record (Art. 27.2 § 1 CAO) and achieve the objectives set out in Art. 27.1 CAO, e.g. to establish the suspect’s identity (see Korneyeva v. Russia, no. 72051/17, § 34, 8 October 2019; Ryabinina and Others v. Russia [Committee], nos. 50271/06 and 8 other applications, § 35, 2 July 2019),

Prot. 7 Art. 2 - delayed review of conviction by a higher tribunal - The sentence of administrative detention imposed on the applicant on 03/02/2021 was executed immediately, on account of the lack of suspensive effect of an appeal under the CAO (see Tsvetkova and Others v. Russia, no. 54381/08, §§ 179-91, 10 April 2018; Martynyuk v. Russia, no. 13764/15, §§ 38 ‑ 42, 8 October 2019)

29794/21

08/05/2021

Viola Nikolayevna TITOVA

1983Manifestation in support of S. Furgal

Krasnoyarsk

15/08/2020

article 20.2 § 5 of CAO

fine RUB 10,000

Krasnoyarsk Regional Court

12/11/2020

Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings - Karelin v. Russia, no. 926/08, 20 September 2016

30013/21

08/05/2021

Vladimir Andreyevich DUBOVSKIY

1991Vladimir Valeryevich Vasin

Krasnoyarsk

Manifestation in support of S. Furgal

Krasnoyarsk

01/08/2020

article 20.2 § 5 of CAO

fine RUB 10,000

Krasnoyarsk Regional Court

12/11/2020

Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings - Karelin v. Russia, no. 926/08, 20 September 2016

30082/21*

11/05/2021

Mikhail Mikhaylovich MOROZOV

1984Darya Dmitriyevna Aksenova

Kolomna

Manifestation in support of A. Navalnyy

Moscow

31/01/2021

article 20.2 § 6.1 of CAO

administrative detention of 14 days

Moscow City Court

12/02/2021

Art. 5 (1) - unlawful deprivation of liberty - arrest and overnight detention from 3 p.m. on 31/01/2021 to 01/02/2021 -

Applicant was taken to the police station as an administrative suspect: no evidence/assessment that it was impracticable, on the spot, to compile the offence record (Art. 27.2 § 1 CAO) and achieve the objectives set out in Art. 27.1 CAO, e.g. to establish the suspect’s identity (see Korneyeva v. Russia, no. 72051/17, § 34, 8 October 2019; Ryabinina and Others v. Russia [Committee], nos. 50271/06 and 8 other applications, § 35, 2 July 2019); Detention as an administrative suspect: beyond the three-hour statutory period (Art. 27.5(1)-(4) CAO) (see Tsvetkova and Others v. Russia, nos. 54381/08 and 5 others, §§ 121-22, 10 April 2018),

Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings,

Art. 6 (1) - and Art. 6 (3) (d) - unfair trial in view of restrictions on the right to examine witnesses - inability to cross-examine in open court police officer on whose written statements the applicant’s conviction was based

31703/21*

07/06/2021

Aleksandr Aleksandrovich SIBIKIN

1991Memorial Human Rights Centre

Moscow

Manifestation in support of A. Navalnyy

Moscow, Matrosskaya Tishina

31/01/2021

article 20.2 § 5 of CAO

fine of RUB 20,000

Moscow City Court

26/03/2021

Art. 5 (1) - unlawful deprivation of liberty - arrest and detention on 31/01/2021 from 4.40 p.m. to 11.40 p.m. - Applicant was taken to the police station as an administrative suspect: no evidence/assessment that it was impracticable on the spot to compile the offence record (Art. 27.2 § 1 CAO) and achieve the objectives set out in Art. 27.1 CAO, e.g., to establish the suspect’s identity (see Korneyeva v. Russia

no. 72051/17, § 34, 8 October 2019; Ryabinina and Others v. Russia [Committee], nos. 50271/06 and 8 other applications, § 35, 2 July 2019).

Detention as an administrative suspect: beyond the three-hour statutory period (Art. 27.5(1)-(4) CAO) (see Tsvetkova and Others v. Russia, nos. 54381/08 and 5 others, §§ 121-22, 10 April 2018) (raised on appeal),

Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings

31824/21*

16/06/2021

Andrey Dmitriyevich GARIFULLIN

1987Aleksandra Nikolayevna Bayeva

Moscow

Manifestation in support of A. Navalnyy

Moscow

31/01/2021

article 20.2 § 5 of CAO

fine of RUB 12,000

Moscow City Court

12/04/2021

Art. 5 (1) - unlawful detention - arrest and detention from 11.45 a.m. to 10.45 p.m. on 31/01/2021 - Applicant was taken to the police station as an administrative suspect: no evidence/assessment that it was impracticable, on the spot, to compile the offence record (Art. 27.2 § 1 CAO) and achieve the objectives set out in Art. 27.1 CAO, e.g. to establish the suspect’s identity (Korneyeva, § 34; Ryabinina and Others [Committee], § 35).

Detention as an administrative suspect for 11 hours: the applicant remained in detention after the offence record had been compiled (see Korneyeva v. Russia, no. 72051/17, § 35, 8 October 2019),

Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings,

Art. 6 (1) - and Art. 6 (3) (d) - unfair trial in view of restrictions on the right to examine witnesses - Inability to cross-examine in open court police officers on whose written statement the conviction was based.

31827/21*

16/06/2021

Anton Dmitriyevich GONCHARUK

1996Aleksandra Nikolayevna Bayeva

Moscow

Manifestation in support of A. Navalnyy

Moscow

31/01/2021

article 20.2 § 6.1 of CAO

administrative arrest of 8 days

St Petersburg City Court

09/03/2021

Art. 5 (1) - unlawful detention - arrest and detention from 1.30 p.m. on 31/01/2021 to 6 p.m. on 01/02/2021 - applicant was taken to the police station as an administrative suspect: no evidence/assessment that it was impracticable, on the spot, to compile the offence record (Art. 27.2 § 1 CAO) and achieve the objectives set out in Art. 27.1 CAO, e.g. to establish the suspect’s identity (Korneyeva, § 34; Ryabinina and Others [Committee], § 35).

Detention as an administrative suspect for 28 hours: the applicant remained in detention after the offence record had been compiled (see Korneyeva v. Russia, no. 72051/17, § 35, 8 October 2019),

Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings,

Prot. 7 Art. 2 - delayed review of conviction by a higher tribunal - the sentence of administrative detention imposed on the applicant on 01/02/2021 was executed immediately, on the account of lack of suspensive effect of an appeal under the CAO

31854/21*

16/06/2021

Yegor Timofeyevich NECHAYEV

2001Aleksandra Nikolayevna Bayeva

Moscow

Manifestation in support of A. Navalnyy

Moscow

31/01/2021

article 20.2 § 6.1 of CAO

arrest of 15 days

Moscow City Court

08/02/2021

Art. 5 (1) - unlawful detention – arrest and detention on 31/01/2021 at the police station - the applicant was taken to the police station as an administrative suspect: no evidence/assessment that it was impracticable, on the spot, to compile the offence record (Art. 27.2 § 1 CAO) and achieve the objectives set out in Art. 27.1 CAO, e.g., to establish the suspect’s identity.

Detention as an administrative suspect for 23 hours (from 5.30 p.m. on 31/01/2021 to 5 p.m. on 01/02/2021: the applicant remained in detention after the offence record had been compiled (see Korneyeva v. Russia, no. 72051/17, § 35, 8 October 2019),

Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings,

Prot. 7 Art. 2 - delayed review of conviction by a higher tribunal - The sentence of administrative detention imposed on the applicant on 01//02/2021 was executed immediately, on the account of lack of suspensive effect of an appeal under the CAO

36365/21*

30/06/2021

Arseniy Mikhaylovich CHEKANOV

2002Memorial Human Rights Centre

Moscow

Manifestation in support of A. Navalnyy

Moscow

31/01/2021

article 20.2 § 5 of CAO

fine of RUB 10,000

Moscow City Court

14/04/2021

Art. 5 (1) - unlawful detention - arrest and detention from 4.30 p.m. on 31/01/2021 to 4.30 a.m. on 01/02/2021 - applicant taken to the police station as an administrative suspect: no evidence/assessment that it was impracticable on the spot to compile the offence record (Art. 27.2 § 1 CAO) and achieve the objectives set out in Art. 27.1 CAO, e.g., to establish the suspect’s identity (see Korneyeva v. Russia, no. 72051/17, § 34, 8 October 2019; Ryabinina and Others v. Russia [Committee], nos. 50271/06 and 8 other applications, § 35, 2 July 2019). Detention as an administrative suspect: beyond the three-hour statutory period (Art. 27.5(1)-(4) CAO) (see Tsvetkova and Others v. Russia, nos. 54381/08 and 5 others, §§ 121-22, 10 April 2018),

Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings

40552/21*

30/07/2021

Olga Valentinovna LEVINA

1956Ivan Yuryevich Zhdanov

Vilnius

Manifestation in support of A. Navalnyy

Tambov

31/01/2021

article 20.2 § 3 of CAO

administrative detention of 15 days

Tambov Regional Court

05/02/2021

Art. 5 (1) - unlawful detention - arrest and detention on 31/01/2021 - Applicant taken to the police station as an administrative suspect: no evidence/assessment that it was impracticable on the spot , to compile the offence record (Art. 27.2 § 1 CAO) and achieve the objectives set out in Art. 27.1 CAO, e.g. to establish the suspect’s identity (see Korneyeva v. Russia, § 34, 8 October 2019; Ryabinina and Others v. Russia [Committee], nos. 50271/06 and 8 other applications, § 35, 2 July 2019),

Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings

45532/21*

12/08/2021

Andrey Sergeyevich CHVANOV

1976Regina Ilgizovna Shagiyeva

Leninigorsk

Manifestation in support of A. Navalnyy

Naberezhnyye Chelny

23/01/2021

article 20.2 § 5 of CAO

fine of RUB 10,000

Supreme Court of the Tatarstan Republic

10/03/2021

Art. 5 (1) - unlawful detention - escorting to the police station on 23/01/2021 and then on 30/01/2021 for compiling an offence report,

Prot. 7 Art. 2 - delayed review of conviction by a higher tribunal - the sentence of administrative detention imposed on the applicant in administrative-offence proceedings under Article 20.2 § 2 of CAO (see below) was executed immediately, on account of the lack of suspensive effect of an appeal under the CAO,

Art. 10 (1) - conviction for making calls to participate in public events - the applicant posted information on Internet concerning the rally to support A. Navalnyy on 31/01/2021, conviction under Article 20.2 § 2 of CAO, penalty in the form of detention for 9 days, final decision on 10/03/2021 by the Supreme Court of the Tatarstan Republic,

Art. 6 (1) - and Art. 6 (3) (d) - unfair trial in view of restrictions on the right to examine witnesses - inability to cross-examine in the trial police officers on whose written statements the applicant’s conviction was based (both sets of the administrative offence proceedings)

51383/21*

30/09/2021

Olga Anatolyevna SHKOLINA

1977Memorial Human Rights Centre

Moscow

Manifestation in support of A. Navalnyy

Arkhangelsk

16/01/2021

article 20.2.2 § 1 of CAO

fine of RUB 11,000

Arkhangelsk Regional Court

02/04/2021

Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings

53264/21*

01/10/2021

Olga Sergeyevna YELSAKOVA

1978Oksana Anatolyevna Vladyka

Arkhangelsk

Manifestation in support of A. Navalny

Arkhangelsk

16/01/2021

article 20.2 § 2 of CAO

45 hours of community service

Arkhangelsk Regional Court

01/04/2021

Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings

57562/21*

07/11/2021

Sharafdzhon Mukimdzhonovich SOBIROV

1984Nikolay Sergeyevich Zboroshenko

Mytishchi

Demonstration in support of Izzat Amon

Moscow

02/04/2021

article 20.2 § 5 of CAO

fine of RUB 5000

Moscow City Court

13/07/2021

Art. 5 (1) - unlawful deprivation of liberty - Detention took place on 02/04/2021 in excess of 3 hours. The applicant was taken to a police station for the sole purpose of drawing up an administrative offence record (raised on appeal in the administrative proceedings),

Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings,

Art. 6 (1) - and Art. 6 (3) (d) - unfair trial in view of restrictions on the right to examine witnesses - inability to cross-examine in open court police officers on whose written statements the applicant’s conviction was based

57565/21*

07/11/2021

Murodali Makhmadnaimovich SALIMOV

1999Nikolay Sergeyevich Zboroshenko

Mytishchi

Demonstration in support of Izzat Amon

Moscow

02/04/2021

article 20.2 § 5 of CAO

fine of RUB 10,000

Moscow City Court

13/07/2021

Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings,

Art. 5 (1) - unlawful deprivation of liberty - Detention took place on 02/04/2021 in excess of 3 hours. The applicant was taken to a police station for the sole purpose of drawing up an administrative offence record (raised on appeal in the administrative proceedings),

Art. 6 (1) - and Art. 6 (3) (d) - unfair trial in view of restrictions on the right to examine witnesses - inability to cross-examine in open court police officers on whose written statements the applicant’s conviction was based

58164/21*

05/11/2021

Mariya Alekseyevna SMIRNOVA

1988Nikolay Sergeyevich Zboroshenko

Mytishchi

Picket in support of A. Navalnyy

Moscow

19/01/2021

article 20.2 § 5 of CAO

fine of RUB 10,000

Moscow City Court

25/08/2021

Art. 5 (1) - unlawful deprivation of liberty - Detention took place on 19/01/2021 in excess of three hours. The applicant was taken to a police station for the sole purpose of drawing up an administrative offence record (raised on appeal in the administrative proceedings),

Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings,

Art. 6 (1) - and Art. 6 (3) (d) - unfair trial in view of restrictions on the right to examine witnesses - inability to cross-examine in open court police officers on whose written statements the applicant’s conviction was based

1435/22*

21/12/2021

Aleksandr Andreyevich YARKIN

2002Mansur Idrisovich Gilmanov

Podolsk

March of Russian nationalists

Moscow

04/11/2020

article 20.2 § 6.1 of CAO

fine of RUB 20,000

Moscow City Court

27/09/2021

Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings, in particular, before the first instance court,

Art. 5 (1) - unlawful deprivation of liberty – escorting to a police station on 04/11/2020 for the sole purpose of drawing up a record of administrative offence - Applicant taken to the police station as an administrative suspect: no evidence/assessment that it was impracticable on the spot to compile the offence record (Art. 27.2 § 1 CAO) and achieve the objectives set out in Art. 27.1 CAO, e.g. to establish the suspect’s identity (see Korneyeva v. Russia, no. 72051/17, § 34, 8 October 2019; Ryabinina and Others v. Russia [Committee], nos. 50271/06 and 8 other applications, § 35, 2 July 2019)

7143/22*

31/01/2022

Svyatoslav Andreyevich LEKONTSEV

2002Ivan Yuryevich Zhdanov

Vilnius

Manifestation in support of A. Navalnyy

Perm

21/04/2021

article 20.2 § 5 of CAO

fine of RUB 10,000

Perm Regional Court

25/08/2021

Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings

8108/22*

18/01/2022

Anastasiya Olegovna GOMENYUK

1986Mariya Valeryevna Chashchilova

Moscow

Manifestation in support of A. Navalnyy

Moscow

31/01/2021

article 20.2 § 5 of CAO

fine of RUB 10,000

Moscow City Court

27/10/2021

Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings,

Art. 5 (1) - unlawful deprivation of liberty - The applicant complained of her detention on 31/01/2021 and that the administrative-offence report could have been drawn up at the place where the offence had been discovered (see Navalnyy and Yashin v. Russia, no. 76204/11, § 92, 4 December 2014; Korneyeva v. Russia, no. 72051/17, § 34, 8 October 2019; and Ryabinina and Others v. Russia [Committee], nos. 50271/06 and 8 other applications, § 35, 2 July 2019). The applicant also complained that she had been detained for more than three hours after the offence record was drawn up without any justification (Tsvetkova and Others v. Russia, nos. 54381/08 and 5 others, §§ 121-22, 10 April 2018). She was detained at 11:50 a.m. on 31/01/2021 and released at midnight. Both complaints were raised on appeal.

Art. 6 (1) - and Art. 6 (3) (d) - unfair trial in view of restrictions on the right to examine witnesses - The applicant complained that she had been unable to cross-examine during the court proceedings the police officers on whose written statements her conviction was based. She duly provided the officers’ names in her motions to domestic courts and explained why it was important to call and examine them.

8587/22

14/01/2022

Sergey Aleksandrovich SMIRNOV

2000Konstantin Mikhaylovich Zinovyev

Nizhniy Novgorod

Manifestation in support of A. Navalnyy

Nizhniy Novgorod

31/01/2021

article 20.2 § 6.1 of CAO

fine of RUB 5,000

Nizhniy Novgorod Regional Court

15/07/2021

Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings;

Art. 5 (1) - unlawful deprivation of liberty - The applicant complained of his detention on 31/01/2021 and that the administrative-offence report could have been drawn up at the place where the offence had been discovered (see Navalnyy and Yashin v. Russia, no. 76204/11, § 92, 4 December 2014; Korneyeva v. Russia, no. 72051/17, § 34, 8 October 2019; and Ryabinina and Others v. Russia [Committee], nos. 50271/06 and 8 other applications, § 35, 2 July 2019).

The applicant also complained that he had been detained for more than three hours after the offence record was drawn up without any justification (Tsvetkova and Others v. Russia, nos. 54381/08 and 5 others, §§ 121-22, 10 April 2018). He was detained at 12:30 p.m. on 31/01/2021 and released at 6:30 p.m. on the same day. Both complaints were raised on appeal.

8599/22

14/01/2022

Vyacheslav Vyacheslavovich ISAKOV

1974Konstantin Mikhaylovich Zinovyev

Nizhniy Novgorod

Manifestation in support of A. Navalnyy

Nizhniy Novgorod

31/01/2021

article 20.2 § 5 of CAO

fine of RUB 5,000

Nizhniy Novgorod Regional Court

15/07/2021

Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings,

Art. 5 (1) - unlawful deprivation of liberty - The applicant complained of his detention on 31/01/2021 and that the administrative-offence report could have been drawn up at the place where the offence had been discovered (see Navalnyy and Yashin v. Russia, no. 76204/11, § 92, 4 December 2014; Korneyeva v. Russia, no. 72051/17, § 34, 8 October 2019; and Ryabinina and Others v. Russia [Committee], nos. 50271/06 and 8 other applications, § 35, 2 July 2019).

The applicant also complained that he had been detained for more than three hours after the offence record was drawn up without any justification (Tsvetkova and Others v. Russia, nos. 54381/08 and 5 others, §§ 121-22, 10 April 2018). He was detained at 12:30 p.m. on 31/01/2021 and released at 8:00 p.m. the same day. Both complaints were raised on appeal.

Art. 6 (1) - and Art. 6 (3) (d) - unfair trial in view of restrictions on the right to examine witnesses - The applicant complained that he had been unable to cross-examine during the court proceedings the police officers on whose written statements his conviction was based. He duly provided the officers’ names in his motions to domestic courts and explained why it was important to call and examine them.

12376/22*

24/02/2022

Manzar Shokhimboyevich YUSUPOV

1985Kseniya Dmitriyevna Prosvirkina

Moscow

Demonstration in support of Izzat Amon

Moscow

02/04/2021

article 20.2 § 5 of CAO

fine of RUB 10,000

Moscow City Court

27/08/2021

Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings

12869/22

17/02/2022

Andrey Valeryevich KRAVTSOV

1984Ilya Vladimirovich Sivoldayev

Voronezh

Manifestation in support of A. Navalnyy

Voronezh

21/04/2021

article 20.2 § 5 of CAO

fine of RUB 10,000

Voronezh Regional Court

17/08/2021

Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings (see Karelin v. Russia, no. 926/08, §§ 69-84, 20 September 2016).

13120/22*

17/02/2022

Igor Aleksandrovich GREKOV

1994Memorial Human Rights Centre

Moscow

Manifestation in support of A. Navalnyy

Voronezh

21/04/2021

article 20.2 § 5 of CAO

fine of RUB 10,000

Voronezh Regional Court

23/08/2021

Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings (see Karelin v. Russia, no. 926/08, §§ 69-84, 20 September 2016),

Art. 5 (1) - unlawful deprivation of liberty - The applicant complained of his detention on 21/04/2021 and that the administrative-offence report could have been drawn up at the place where the offence had been discovered (see Navalnyy and Yashin v. Russia, no. 76204/11, § 92, 4 December 2014; Korneyeva v. Russia, no. 72051/17, § 34, 8 October 2019; and Ryabinina and Others v. Russia [Committee], nos. 50271/06 and 8 other applications, § 35, 2 July 2019) (raised on appeal),

Art. 6 (1) - and Art. 6 (3) (d) - unfair trial in view of restrictions on the right to examine witnesses - The applicant complained that he had been unable to cross-examine during the court proceedings the police officers on whose written statements his conviction was based. He duly provided the officers’ names in his motions to domestic courts and explained why it was important to call and examine them.

13124/22

17/02/2022

Aleksey Sergeyevich FILIPPOV

1989Memorial Human Rights Centre

Moscow

Manifestation in support of A. Navalnyy

Ivanovo

21/04/2021

article 20.2 § 5 of CAO

fine of RUB 10,000

Ivanovo Regional Court

23/08/2021

Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings (see Karelin v. Russia, no. 926/08, §§ 69-84, 20 September 2016),

Art. 5 (1) - unlawful deprivation of liberty - The applicant complained of his detention on 21/04/2021 and that the administrative-offence report could have been drawn up at the place where the offence had been discovered (see Navalnyy and Yashin v. Russia, no. 76204/11, § 92, 4 December 2014; Korneyeva v. Russia, no. 72051/17, § 34, 8 October 2019; and Ryabinina and Others v. Russia [Committee], nos. 50271/06 and 8 other applications, § 35, 2 July 2019) (raised on appeal),

Art. 6 (1) - and Art. 6 (3) (d) - unfair trial in view of restrictions on the right to examine witnesses - The applicant complained that he had been unable to cross-examine during the court proceedings the police officers on whose written statements his conviction was based. He duly provided the officers’ names in his motions to domestic courts and explained why it was important to call and examine them.

13126/22*

17/02/2022

Lev Robertovich PUSHNOV

1963Memorial Human Rights Centre

Moscow

Manifestation in support of A. Navalnyy

Moscow

31/01/2021

article 20.2 § 6.1 of CAO

fine of RUB 15,000

Moscow City Court

23/09/2021

Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings (see Karelin v. Russia, no. 926/08, §§ 69-84, 20 September 2016),

Art. 5 (1) - unlawful deprivation of liberty - The applicant complained of his detention on 31/01/2021 and that the administrative-offence report could have been drawn up at the place where the offence had been discovered (see Navalnyy and Yashin v. Russia, no. 76204/11, § 92, 4 December 2014; Korneyeva v. Russia, no. 72051/17, § 34, 8 October 2019; and Ryabinina and Others v. Russia [Committee], nos. 50271/06 and 8 other applications, § 35, 2 July 2019) (raised on appeal);

Art. 6 (1) - and Art. 6 (3) (d) - unfair trial in view of restrictions on the right to examine witnesses - The applicant complained that he had been unable to cross-examine during the court proceedings the police officers on whose written statements his conviction was based. He duly provided the officers’ names in his motions to domestic courts and explained why it was important to call and examine them

13540/22*

31/01/2022

Andrey Denisovich BOKAREV

1997Ruslan Yuryevich Bannikov

Voronezh

Manifestation in support of A. Navalnyy

Voronezh

21/04/2021

article 20.2 § 5 of CAO

fine of RUB 10,000

Voronezh Regional Court

28/09/2021

Art. 5 (1) - unlawful deprivation of liberty - arrest and detention on 21-22/04/2021 in excess of 3 hours for the sole purpose of drawing up a record of administrative offence (raised on appeal),

Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings

19137/22*

26/03/2022

Tazret Sergeyevich TEDEYEV

1991Manifestation in support of A. Navalnyy

Moscow

02/02/2021

article 20.2 § 6.1 of CAO

fine of RUB 10,000

Moscow City Court

27/09/2021

Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings;

Art. 5 (1) - unlawful deprivation of liberty - arrest on 02/02/2021 for the sole purpose of drawing up a record of administrative offence (raised on appeal)

28513/22*

13/05/2022

Nadezhda Leonidovna ZAGORDAN

1984Yuliya Mikhaylovna Tregubova

Balashikha

Manifestation in support of A. Navalnyy

Moscow

23/01/2021

article 20.2 § 5 of CAO

fine of RUB 20,000

Moscow City Court

17/11/2021

Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings

29348/22

14/05/2022

Stepan Vladimirovich SAMOYLENKO

1993Natalya Andreyevna Baranova

Moscow

Manifestation in support of A. Navalnyy

Moscow

21/04/2021

article 20.2 § 5 of CAO

fine of RUB 20,000

Moscow City Court

15/11/2021

Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings,

Art. 5 (1) - unlawful deprivation of liberty - arrest on 22/05/2021 for the sole purpose of drawing up a record of administrative offence (raised on appeal)

30755/22*

06/03/2022

Aleksandr Nikolayevich KOLOSOV

1981Memorial Human Rights Centre

Moscow

"Political performance" in support of "The Other Russia" political party of E. Limonov

St Petersburg

29/07/2021

article 20.2 § 2 of CAO

administrative detention of 3 days

St Petersburg City Court

07/09/2021

Art. 5 (1) - unlawful detention - Detention took place from 3 p.m. on 29/07/2021 to 3 p.m. on 30/07/2021. The applicant was taken to a police station for the sole purpose of drawing up an administrative offence record (raised on appeal),

Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings,

Prot. 7 Art. 2 - delayed review of conviction by a higher tribunal - The sentence of administrative detention imposed on the applicant on 30/07/2021 was executed immediately, on account of the lack of suspensive effect of an appeal under the CAO

5090/23*

13/01/2023

Aleksandr Yevgenyevich SHAPOSHNIKOV

2003Vladimir Sergeyevich Nemanov

Moscow

Demonstration in memory of Boris Nemtsov

Moscow

27/02/2022

article 20.2 § 5 of CAO

fine of RUB 15,000

Moscow City Court

13/09/2022

Art. 5 (1) - unlawful deprivation of liberty - Detention took place from 5.45 p.m. on 27/02/2022 to 2.55 a.m. on 28/02/2022. The applicant was taken to a police station for the sole purpose of drawing up an administrative offence record and remained in the detention beyond 3-hour statutory period (raised on appeal in the administrative proceedings),

Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings