SKOROKHODOV v. RUSSIA and 30 other applications
Doc ref: 38070/21, 38179/21, 41042/21, 41079/21, 43685/21, 45063/21, 45070/21, 45707/21, 46123/21, 46221/21, ... • ECHR ID: 001-227936
Document date: September 7, 2023
- Inbound citations: 0
- •
- Cited paragraphs: 0
- •
- Outbound citations: 0
Published on 2 October 2023
SECOND SECTION
Application no. 38070/21 Nikita Valeryevich SKOROKHODOV against Russia and 30 other applications
(see list appended)
PROCEDURAL INFORMATION
Following a preliminary examination of the admissibility of the applications on 7 September 2023, the Court decided, under Rule 54 § 2 (b) of the Rules of Court, that notice of the applications should be given to the Government of Russia.
In the applications marked by an asterisk, other complaints were raised. This part of the applications has been struck out of the Court’s list of cases or declared inadmissible by the Court, sitting in a single-judge formation, assisted by a rapporteur as provided for in Article 24 § 2 of the Convention.
In the enclosed list of applications, whenever an applicant is referred to using initials, this indicates that the Court has authorised anonymity for that person, whose identity will not be disclosed to the public (Rule 47 § 4).
For further information on the procedure following communication of an application brought against Russia, subject of well-established case law of the Court, please refer to the Court’s website .
SUBJECT MATTER
The applications concern complaints raised under Article 11 of the Convention relating to disproportionate measures against organisers and participants of public assemblies which are the subject of well-established case law of the Court (see Frumkin v. Russia, no. 74568/12, ECHR 2016 (extracts); Navalnyy and Yashin v. Russia, no. 76204/11, 4 December 2014; and Kasparov and Others v. Russia, no. 21613/07, 3 October 2013).
APPENDIX – STATEMENT OF FACTS
List of applications raising complaints under Article 11 of the Convention (disproportionate measures against organisers and participants of public assemblies)
No.
Application no.
Date of introduction
Applicant’s name
Year of birth
Representative’s name and location
Name of the public event
Location
Date
Administrative charges
Penalty
Final domestic decision
Court Name
Date
Other complaints under well-established case-law
38070/21*
14/07/2021
Nikita Valeryevich SKOROKHODOV
1996Yelena Yuryevna Pershakova
Moscow
Rally in support of
Mr A. Navalnyy
Moscow
31/01/2021
article 20.2 § 6.1 of CAO
administrative detention of 10 days
Moscow City Court
12/03/2021
Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings - final decision: Moscow City Court, 12/03/2021;
Art. 5 (1) - unlawful deprivation of liberty: escorting to a police station for the purpose of drawing up a record of administrative offence; detention in excess of 3 hours and without “exceptional circumstancesâ€, from 11.40 a.m. on 31/01/2021 to 2.00 p.m. on 01/02/2021;
Art. 6 (1) - and Art. 6 (3) (d) - unfair trial in view of restrictions on the right to examine witnesses - inability to cross-examine in open court police officers on whose written statements the applicant’s conviction was based;
Prot. 7 Art. 2 - delayed review of conviction by a higher tribunal - the sentence of administrative detention imposed on the applicant was executed immediately, on account of the lack of suspensive effect of an appeal under the CAO.
38179/21*
16/07/2021
Filipp Freddiyevich KADENA
1996Memorial Human Rights Centre
Moscow
Rally in support of
Mr A. Navalnyy
Moscow
02/02/2021
article 20.2 § 5 of CAO
fine of
RUB 10,000
Moscow City Court
26/04/2021
Art. 5 (1) - unlawful deprivation of liberty: escorting to a police station for the purpose of drawing up a record of administrative offence; detention in excess of 3 hours and without “exceptional circumstancesâ€, from 11.22 p.m. on 02/02/2021 to 6.57 a.m. on 03/02/2021;
Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings - final decision: Moscow City Court, 26/04/2021;
Art. 6 (1) - and Art. 6 (3) (d) - unfair trial in view of restrictions on the right to examine witnesses - inability to cross-examine in open court police officers on whose written statements the applicant’s conviction was based.
41042/21*
23/07/2021
Timofey Nikitich SOLOVOV
2000Georgiy Eduardovich Tevosov
Moscow
Rally in support of
Mr A. Navalnyy
Moscow
03/02/2021
article 20.2 § 6.1 of CAO
administrative detention of
7 days
Moscow City Court
30/03/2021
Art. 5 (1) (c) - unlawful deprivation of liberty: escorting to a police station for the purpose of drawing up a record of administrative offence; detention in excess of 3 hours and without “exceptional circumstancesâ€, from 00.15 a.m. on 03/02/2021 to 04/02/2021, the hearing in the applicant’s administrative-offence case;
Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings - final decision: Moscow City Court, 30/03/2021.
41079/21
28/07/2021
Daniil Antonovich SHESTAKOV
1997Anna Yevgenyevna Bochilo
Barnaul
Rally in support to
Mr A. Navalnyy
Perm
23/01/2021
Rally (march) in support of
Mr A. Navalnyy
Perm
31/01/2021
Hybrid political rally (demonstration and march)
Perm
21/04/2021
article 20.2 § 5 of CAO
article 20.2 § 5 of CAO
article 20.2 § 8 of CAO
fine of
RUB 10,000
fine of
RUB 10,000
administrative detention of 10 days
Perm Regional Court
13/04/2021
Perm Regional Court
03/09/2021
Perm Regional Court
30/04/2021
Art. 5 (1) - unlawful deprivation of liberty: escorting to a police station for the purpose of drawing up a record of administrative offence; detention in excess of 3 hours and without “exceptional circumstancesâ€:
- from 9.00 p.m. on 23/01/2021 (few hours after the end of the rally) to 00.00 a.m. on 24/01/2021, while the record of administrative offence was drawn up later, and the applicant’s deprivation of liberty was not recorded in any way,
- from 1.40 p.m. to 6.00 p.m. on 31/01/2021,
- from 3.00 p.m. on 22/04/2021 to 23/04/2021, hearing in the applicant’s administrative-offence case;
Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in all sets of the administrative-offence proceedings - final decisions: Perm City Court, 13/04/2021, 30/04/2021 and 03/09/2021;
Art. 6 (1) - and Art. 6 (3) (d) - unfair trial in view of restrictions on the right to examine witnesses - inability to cross-examine in open court police officers on whose written statements the applicant’s three convictions were based;
Prot. 7 Art. 2 - delayed review of conviction by a higher tribunal - the sentence of administrative detention imposed on the applicant by the court of first instance was executed immediately, on account of the lack of suspensive effect of an appeal under the CAO.
43685/21*
16/08/2021
Fedor Konstantinovich KOLESNICHENKO
1995Ivan Yuryevich Zhdanov
Vilnius
Rally in support to
Mr A. Navalnyy
Moscow
23/01/2021
article 20.2 § 5 of CAO
fine of
RUB 20,000
Moscow City Court
04/03/2021
Art. 5 (1) - unlawful deprivation of liberty: escorting to a police station for the purpose of drawing up a record of administrative offence; detention in excess of 3 hours and without “exceptional circumstancesâ€, from 7.00 p.m. on 23/01/2021 to 25/01/2021, hearing in the applicant’s administrative-offence case;
Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings - final decision: Moscow City Court, 04/03/2021;
Art. 6 (1) - and Art. 6 (3) (d) - unfair trial in view of restrictions on the right to examine witnesses - inability to cross-examine in open court police officers on whose written statements the applicant’s conviction was based.
45063/21*
02/09/2021
Anastasiya Aleksandrovna POPOVA
1992Aleksandr Yevgenyevich Pomazuyev
Vilnius
Rally in support of
Mr A. Navalnyy
Syvtyrkar, Komi Republic
31/01/2021
article 20.2 § 5 of CAO
fine of
RUB 10,000
Supreme Court of the Komi Republic
17/03/2021
Art. 5 (1) - unlawful deprivation of liberty: escorting to a police station for the purpose of drawing up a record of administrative offence; detention in excess of 3 hours and without “exceptional circumstancesâ€, from 1.55 p.m. to 09.15 p.m. on 31/01/2021;
Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings - final decision: Supreme Court of the Komi Republic, 17/03/2021;
Art. 6 (1) - and Art. 6 (3) (d) - unfair trial in view of restrictions on the right to examine witnesses - inability to cross-examine in open court police officers on whose written statements the applicant’s conviction was based.
45070/21*
09/08/2021
Varvara Yuryevna ZHARKAYA
1983Aleksandr Yevgenyevich Karavayev
Nizhniy Novgorod
Rally in support of
Mr A. Navalnyy
Moscow
02/02/2021
article 20.2 § 6.1 of CAO
administrative detention of 10 days
Moscow City Court
10/02/2021
Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings - final decision: Moscow City Court, 10/02/2021;
Art. 6 (1) - and Art. 6 (3) (d) - unfair trial in view of restrictions on the right to examine witnesses - inability to cross-examine in open court police officers on whose written statements the applicant’s conviction was based.
45707/21*
26/08/2021
Aleksandra Olegovna VORONINA
1991Dmitriy Vladimirovich Zubarev
Vladivostok
Rally in support of
Mr A. Navalnyy
Vladivostok
31/01/2021
article 20.2 § 5 of CAO
fine of
RUB 15,000
Primorye Regional Court
30/03/2021
Art. 5 (1) - unlawful deprivation of liberty - escorting to a police station for the purpose of drawing up a record of administrative offence; detention in excess of 3 hours and without “exceptional circumstancesâ€, from 2.10 p.m. to 7.30 p.m. on 31/01/2021;
Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings - final decision: Primorye Regional Court, 30/03/2021;
Art. 6 (1) - and Art. 6 (3) (d) - unfair trial in view of restrictions on the right to examine witnesses - inability to cross-examine in open court police officers on whose written statements the applicant’s conviction was based.
46123/21*
10/09/2021
Sergey Valeryevich GOROKHOV
1974Rally in support of
Mr A. Navalnyy
Volgograd
23/01/2021
article 20.2 § 5 of CAO
fine of
RUB 10,000
Volgograd Regional Court
24/03/2021
Art. 5 (1) unlawful deprivation of liberty: escorting to a police station for the purpose of drawing up a record of administrative offence; detention in excess of 3 hours and without “exceptional circumstancesâ€, from 3.45 p.m. to
9.30 p.m. on 23/01/2021;
Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings - final decision: Volgograd Regional Court, 24/03/2021;
Art. 10 (1) - disproportionate measures against solo demonstrators - solo picketing on 23/01/2021 in Volgograd; administrative conviction under Art. 20.2 § 5 of the CAO to a fine of RUB 10,000. Final decision: Volgograd Regional Court, 24/03/2021;
Art. 6 (1) - and Art. 6 (3) (d) - unfair trial in view of restrictions on the right to examine witnesses - inability to cross-examine in open court police officers on whose written statements the applicant’s conviction was based.
46221/21*
10/09/2021
Konstantin Olegovich ZARUBA
1990Ivan Yuryevich Zhdanov
Vilnius
Rally in support of
Mr A. Navalnyy
Moscow
31/01/2021
article 20.2 § 5 of CAO
fine of
RUB 15,000
Moscow City Court
22/03/2021
Art. 5 (1) - unlawful deprivation of liberty: escorting to a police station for the purpose of drawing up a record of administrative offence; detention in excess of 3 hours and without “exceptional circumstancesâ€, from 5.30 p.m. to 10.00 p.m. on 31/01/2021;
Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings - final decision: Moscow City Court, 22/03/2021;
Art. 6 (1) - and Art. 6 (3) (d) - unfair trial in view of restrictions on the right to examine witnesses - inability to cross-examine in open court police officers on whose written statements the applicant’s conviction was based.
46413/21*
18/08/2021
Ayyyskhan Ivanovich ALEKSEYEV
1987Aleksandr Yevgenyevich Pomazuyev
Vilnius
Rally in support of
Mr A. Navalnyy
Yakutsk
31/01/2021
article 20.2.2 § 1 of CAO
fine of
RUB 5,000
Supreme Court of the Sakha (Yakutia) Republic
19/03/2021
Art. 5 (1) - unlawful deprivation of liberty: escorting to a police station for the purpose of drawing up a record of administrative offence; detention in excess of 3 hours and without “exceptional circumstancesâ€, from 12.50 p.m. on 31/01/2021 to 02/02/2021, hearing in the applicant’s administrative-offence case;
Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in both sets of the administrative-offence proceedings - final decisions: Supreme Court of the Sakha (Yakutia) Republic, 19/03/2021;
Art. 6 (1) - and Art. 6 (3) (d) - unfair trial in view of restrictions on the right to examine witnesses - inability to cross-examine in open court police officers on whose written statements the applicant’s convictions were based;
Art. 10 (1) - conviction for making calls to participate in public events - calls on the Internet for a rally in support to Mr A. Navalny scheduled for 23/01/2021, administrative conviction under Art. 20.2 § 21 of the CAO, fine of RUB 10,000. Final decision: the Supreme Court of the Sakha (Yakutia) Republic, 19/03/2021.
46427/21
03/09/2021
Vladislav Romanovich KACHEROV
2000Feliks Yevgenyevich Vertegel
Krasnodar
Rally in support of
Mr A. Navalnyy
Krasnodar
23/01/2021
article 20.2 § 2 of CAO
administrative detention of
1 day
Krasnodar Regional Court
15/03/2021
Art. 5 (1) - unlawful deprivation of liberty: escorting to a police station for the purpose of drawing up a record of administrative offence; detention in excess of 3 hours and without “exceptional circumstancesâ€, from 5.20 p.m. on 23/01/2021 to 24/01/2021, hearing in the applicant’s administrative-offence case;
Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings - final decision: Krasnodar Regional Court, 15/03/2021;
Art. 6 (1) - and Art. 6 (3) (d) - unfair trial in view of restrictions on the right to examine witnesses - inability to cross-examine in open court police officers on whose written statements the applicant’s conviction was based.
46699/21*
17/09/2021
Yekaterina Mikhaylovna VANSLOVA
1990Mariya Aleksandrovna Zadorozhnaya
Nizhniy Novgorod
Rally in support of
Mr A. Navalnyy
Nizhniy Novgorod
31/01/2021
article 20.2 § 5 of CAO
fine of
RUB 10,000
Nizhniy Novgorod Regional Court
18/03/2021
Art. 5 (1) (c) - unlawful pre-trial detention: escorting to a police station for the purpose of drawing up a record of administrative offence; detention in excess of 3 hours and without “exceptional circumstancesâ€, from 1.40 p.m. on 31/01/2021 to 1.00 p.m. on 01/02/2021, hearing in the applicant’s administrative-offence case;
Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings - final decision: Nizhniy Novgorod Regional Court, 18/03/2021;
Art. 6 (1) - and Art. 6 (3) (d) - unfair trial in view of restrictions on the right to examine witnesses - impossibility to cross-examine police officers on whose statements the applicant’s conviction was based.
47009/21*
15/09/2021
Yelena Valeriyevna YEVSEYEVA
1977Aleksandr Yevgenyevich Pomazuyev
Vilnius
Rally in support of
Mr A. Navalnyy
Saransk, Republic of Mordovia
31/01/2021
article 20.2 § 6.1 of CAO
fine of
RUB 10,000
Supreme Court of the Mordovia Republic
24/03/2021
Art. 5 (1) - unlawful deprivation of liberty: escorting to a police station for the purpose of drawing up a record of administrative offence; detention in excess of 3 hours and without “exceptional circumstancesâ€, from 1.30 p.m. to 10.00 p.m. on 31/01/2021;
Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings - final decision: Supreme Court of the Mordovia Republic, 24/03/2021;
Art. 6 (1) - and Art. 6 (3) (d) - unfair trial in view of restrictions on the right to examine witnesses - impossibility to cross-examine police officers on whose statements the applicant’s conviction was based.
47891/21
07/09/2021
Sergey Nikolayevich DYADKIN
1969Inna Viktorovna Kosheleva
Kirov
Rally in support of
Mr A. Navalnyy
Kirov
23/01/2021
Rally in support of
Mr A. Navalnyy
Kirov
31/01/2021
article 20.2 § 5 of CAO
article 20.2 § 5 of CAO
fine of
RUB 10,000
fine of
RUB 10,000
Kirov Regional Court
09/03/2021
Kirov Regional Court
25/05/2021
Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings - final decisions: Kirov Regional Court, 09/03/2021 and 25/05/2021;
Art. 6 (1) - and Art. 6 (3) (d) - unfair trial in view of restrictions on the right to examine witnesses - impossibility to cross-examine police officers on whose statements the applicant’s convictions were based.
48359/21*
23/09/2021
Denis Aleksandrovich TASKIN
1990Andrey Olegovich Valenkov
Nizhniy Novgorod
Rally in support of
Mr A. Navalnyy
Nizhniy Novgorod
31/01/2021
article 20.2 § 5 of CAO
fine of
RUB 10,000
Nizhniy Novgorod Regional Court
24/03/2021
Art. 5 (1) - unlawful deprivation of liberty: escorting to a police station for the purpose of drawing up a record of administrative offence; detention in excess of 3 hours and without “exceptional circumstancesâ€, from 1.20 p.m. on 31/01/2021 to 3.00 p.m. on 01/02/2021;
Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings - final decision: Nizhniy Novgorod Regional Court, 24/03/2021;
Art. 6 (1) - and Art. 6 (3) (d) - unfair trial in view of restrictions on the right to examine witnesses - inability to cross-examine in open court police officer on whose written statements the applicant’s conviction was based.
49416/21*
01/10/2021
Vladislav Kirillovich SHTUKATUROV
1997Aleksandr Yevgenyevich Pomazuyev
Vilnius
Rally in support to
Mr A. Navalnyy
Ryazan
23/01/2021
article 20.2 § 2 of CAO
fine of
RUB 10,000
Ryazan Regional Court
08/04/2021
Art. 5 (1) - unlawful deprivation of liberty: escorting to a police station for the purpose of drawing up a record of administrative offence; detention in excess of 3 hours and without “exceptional circumstancesâ€, from 2.20 p.m. on 23/01/2021 to 10.25 a.m. on 24/01/2021, hearing in the applicant’s administrative-offence case;
Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings - final decision: Ryazan Regional Court, 08/04/2021;
Art. 6 (1) - and Art. 6 (3) (d) - unfair trial in view of restrictions on the right to examine witnesses - inability to cross-examine in open court police officer on whose written statements the applicant’s conviction was based.
49480/21*
01/10/2021
Oleg Nikolayevich TOTSKIY
2002Aleksandr Yevgenyevich Pomazuyev
Vilnius
Rally in support to
Mr A. Navalnyy
Vladivostok
23/01/2021
article 20.2 § 6.1 of CAO
fine of
RUB 10,000
Primorye Regional Court
12/04/2021
Art. 5 (1) - unlawful deprivation of liberty: escorting to a police station for the purpose of drawing up a record of administrative offence; detention in excess of 3 hours and without “exceptional circumstancesâ€, from 3.00 p.m. to 10.00 p.m. on 23/01/2021, while the said record was drawn up only on 01/03/2021;
Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings - final decision: Primorye Regional Court, 12/04/2021;
Art. 6 (1) - and Art. 6 (3) (d) - unfair trial in view of restrictions on the right to examine witnesses - inability to cross-examine in open court police officer on whose written statements the applicant’s conviction was based.
49512/21*
01/10/2021
Ron Igorevich DEYCH
2000Ivan Yuryevich Zhdanov
Vilnius
Rally in support of
Mr A. Navalnyy
Nizhniy Novgorod
31/01/2021
article 20.2 § 6.1 of CAO
fine of
RUB 10,000
Nizhniy Novgorod Regional Court
07/04/2021
Art. 5 (1) - unlawful deprivation of liberty: escorting to a police station for the purpose of drawing up a record of administrative offence; detention in excess of 3 hours and without “exceptional circumstancesâ€, from 12.05 p.m. on 31/01/2021 to 02/02/2010, hearing in the applicant’s administrative-offence case;
Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings - final decision: Nizhniy Novgorod Regional Court, 07/04/2021;
Art. 6 (1) - and Art. 6 (3) (d) - unfair trial in view of restrictions on the right to examine witnesses - inability to cross-examine in open court police officer on whose written statements the applicant’s conviction was based.
49677/21*
16/09/2021
Angelina Vladimirovna BURDAKOVA
1994Danil Ilnurovich Nurgaleyev
Kazan
Rally in support of Mr A. Navalnyy
Kazan
31/01/2021
article 20.2 § 5 of CAO
fine of
RUB 10,000
Supreme Court of the Tatarstan Republic
31/03/2021
49679/21*
17/09/2021
Yelena Vasilyevna GULINA
1968Ernest Aleksandrovich Mezak
Saint-Barthélemy-d’Anjou
Rally in support of
Mr A. Navalnyy
Syktyvkar
23/01/2021
Rally in support of
Mr A. Navalnyy
Syktyvkar
31/01/2021
article 20.2 § 5 of CAO
article 20.2 § 5 of CAO
fine of
RUB 10,000
fine of
RUB 10,000
Supreme Court of the Komi Republic
12/05/2021
Supreme Court of the Komi Republic
17/03/2021
Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in both sets of the administrative-offence proceedings - final decisions: Supreme Court of the Komi Republic, 17/03/2021 and 12/05/2021.
49714/21
17/09/2021
Kirill Alekseyevich FOKIN
1999Vladislav Vladimirovich Kosnyrev
Syktyvkar
Rally in support of
Mr A. Navalnyy
Syktyvkar
31/01/2021
article 20.2 § 5 of CAO
fine of
RUB 10,000
Supreme Court of the Komi Republic
17/03/2021
Art. 5 (1) - unlawful deprivation of liberty: escorting to a police station for the purpose of drawing up a record of administrative offence; detention in excess of 3 hours and without “exceptional circumstancesâ€, from 1.00 p.m. to
9.30 p.m. on 31/01/2021;
Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings - final decision: Supreme Court of the Komi Republic, 17/03/2021.
49723/21
17/09/2021
Galina Aleksandrovna LOGINOVSKIKH
1965Vladislav Vladimirovich Kosnyrev
Syktyvkar
Rally in support of
Mr A. Navalnyy
Syktyvkar
31/01/2021
article 20.2 § 5 of CAO
fine of
RUB 10,000
Supreme Court of the Komi Republic
17/03/2021
Art. 5 (1) unlawful deprivation of liberty: escorting to a police station for the purpose of drawing up a record of administrative offence; detention in excess of 3 hours and without “exceptional circumstancesâ€, from 1.45 p.m. to
8.30 p.m. on 31/01/2021;
Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings - final decision: Supreme Court of the Komi Republic, 17/03/2021.
50084/21*
24/09/2021
Ilya Andreyevich YUDIN
1993Rally in support of
Mr A. Navalnyy
Samara
31/01/2021
article 20.2 § 2 of CAO
administrative detention of
7 days
Samara Regional Court
01/04/2021
Art. 5 (1) - unlawful deprivation of liberty: escorting to a police station for the purpose of drawing up a record of administrative offence; detention in excess of 3 hours and without “exceptional circumstancesâ€, from 2.00 p.m. on 31/01/2021 to 9.00 a.m. on 01/02/2021, hearing in the applicant’s administrative-offence case;
Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings - final decision: Samara Regional Court, 01/04/2021.
50105/21*
21/09/2021
Yekaterina Yuryevna SURIKOVA
2002Darya Dmitriyevna Aksenova
Kolomna
Rally in support of
Mr A. Navalnyy
Moscow
31/01/2021
article 20.2 § 5 of CAO
fine of
RUB 15,000
Moscow City Court
22/03/2021
Art. 5 (1) - unlawful deprivation of liberty: escorting to a police station for the purpose of drawing up a record of administrative offence; detention in excess of 3 hours and without “exceptional circumstancesâ€, from 3.15 p.m. to 10.15 p.m. on 31/01/2021,
Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings - final decision: Moscow City Court, 22/03/2021;
Art. 6 (1) - and Art. 6 (3) (d) - unfair trial in view of restrictions on the right to examine witnesses - impossibility to cross-examine police officers on whose statements the applicant’s conviction was based.
50417/21*
29/09/2021
Aleksandr Valeryevich YEGOROV
1994Ilya Valeryevich Tkachenko
Gatchina
Rally in support of
Mr A. Navalnyy
St Petersburg
31/01/2021
article 20.2 § 6.1 of CAO
administrative detention of 10 days
St City Court
30/03/2021
Art. 5 (1) - unlawful deprivation of liberty: escorting to a police station for the purpose of drawing up a record of administrative offence; detention in excess of 3 hours and without “exceptional circumstancesâ€, from 2.00 p.m. on 31/01/2021 to 01/02/2021, hearing in the applicant’s administrative-offence case;
Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings - final decision: St Petersburg City Court, 30/03/2021;
Art. 6 (1) - and Art. 6 (3) (d) - unfair trial in view of restrictions on the right to examine witnesses - impossibility to cross-examine police officers on whose statements the applicant’s conviction was based.
50477/21*
29/09/2021
Yevgeniy Sergeyevich DRUSHCHENKO
1990Feliks Yevgenyevich Vertegel
Krasnodar
Rally in support of
Mr A. Navalnyy
Krasnodar
23/01/2021
article 20.2 § 5 of CAO
fine of
RUB 10,000
Krasnodar Regional Court
31/03/2021
Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings - final decision: Krasnodar Regional Court, 31/03/2021;
Art. 6 (1) - and Art. 6 (3) (d) - unfair trial in view of restrictions on the right to examine witnesses - inability to cross-examine in open court police officer on whose written statements the applicant’s conviction was based.
50671/21*
29/09/2021
Daniil Vladimirovich PROKOPENKO
1991Marina Alekseyevna Dubrovina
Novorossiysk
Rally in support of
Mr A. Navalnyy
Anapa
31/01/2021
article 20.2 § 5 of CAO
fine of
RUB 18,000
Krasnodar Regional Court
29/03/2021
Art. 5 (1) - unlawful deprivation of liberty: escorting to a police station for the purpose of drawing up a record of administrative offence; detention in excess of 3 hours and without “exceptional circumstancesâ€, from 1.50 p.m. to 8.30 p.m. on 31/01/2021;
Art. 6 (1) - and Art. 6 (3) (d) - unfair trial in view of restrictions on the right to examine witnesses - inability to cross-examine in open court police officer on whose written statements the applicant’s conviction was based;
Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings - final decision: Krasnodar Regional Court, 29/03/2021.
50901/21*
01/10/2021
Andrey Konstantinovich ROMANOV
1998Darya Dmitriyevna Aksenova
Kolomna
Rally in support of Mr A. Navalnyy
Moscow
23/01/2021
article 20.2 § 5 of CAO
community works of
30 hours
Moscow City Court
22/04/2021
Art. 5 (1) - unlawful deprivation of liberty: escorting to a police station for the purpose of drawing up a record of administrative offence on 23/01/2021;
Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings - final decision: Moscow City Court, 22/04/2021;
Art. 6 (1) - and Art. 6 (3) (d) - unfair trial in view of restrictions on the right to examine witnesses - impossibility to cross-examine police officers on whose statements the applicant’s conviction was based.
50963/21
30/09/2021
Aleksandr Yuryevich PESKOV
1996Aleksey Mikhaylovich Kuroptev
Balashikha
Rally in support of
Mr A. Navalnyy
Cherepovets
31/01/2021
article 20.2 § 2 of CAO
fine of
RUB 20,000
Vologda Regional Court
01/04/2021
Art. 5 (1) - unlawful deprivation of liberty: escorting to a police station for the purpose of drawing up a record of administrative offence; detention in excess of 3 hours and without “exceptional circumstancesâ€, from 11.55 a.m. to 04.00 p.m. on 31/01/2021;
Art. 10 (1) - conviction for making calls to participate in public events - calls on the Internet to participate in an unauthorised rally in support of Mr A. Navalnyy, scheduled for 31/01/2021, administrative conviction under Art. 20.2 § 2 of the CAO, fine of RUB 20,000, final decision: Vologda Regional Court, 01/04/2021;
Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings - final decisions: Vologda Regional Court, 01/04/2021;
Art. 6 (1) - and Art. 6 (3) (d) - unfair trial in view of restrictions on the right to examine witnesses - inability to cross-examine in open court police officer on whose written statements the applicant’s convictions were based.
51387/21*
30/09/2021
Yakov Valeryevich KRASOVSKIY
1998Memorial Human Rights Centre
Moscow
Rally in support of
Mr A. Navalnyy
St Petersburg
21/04/2021
article 20.2.2 § 1 of CAO
administrative detention of
8 days
St Petersburg City Court
27/04/2021
Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings - final decision: St Petersburg City Court, 27/04/2021;
Art. 5 (1) - unlawful deprivation of liberty: escorting to a police station for the purpose of drawing up a record of administrative offence; detention in excess of 3 hours and without “exceptional circumstancesâ€, from 7.50 p.m. on 21/04/2021 to 7.10 p.m. on 22/04/2021, hearing in the applicant’s administrative-offence case;
Prot. 7 Art. 2 - delayed review of conviction by a higher tribunal - the sentence of administrative detention imposed on the applicant by the court of first instance was executed immediately, on account of the lack of suspensive effect of an appeal under the CAO;
Art. 6 (1) - and Art. 6 (3) (d) - unfair trial in view of restrictions on the right to examine witnesses - inability to cross-examine in open court police officers on whose written statements the applicant’s conviction was based.