Browsing history:

↳
CASE OF NADA v. SWITZERLANDCONCURRING OPINION OF JUDGE MALINVERNI
CASE OF SİNİM v. TURKEYJOINT CONCURRING OPINION OF JUDGES SPANO AND BIANKU
CASE OF MARPA ZEELAND B.V. AND METAL WELDING B.V. AGAINST THE NETHERLANDS
Commission Regulation (EC) No 599/2001 of 28 March 2001 altering the export refunds on white sugar and raw sugar exported in the natural state
Judgment of the Court (Sixth Chamber) of 13 July 2000. Idéal tourisme SA v Belgian State.
Council Implementing Regulation (EU) No 494/2013 of 29 May 2013 implementing Regulation (EC) No 765/2006 concerning restrictive measures in respect of Belarus

Document text Analytics

Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 4 May 2016.

European Commission v Republic of Austria.

C-346/14 • 62014CJ0346 • ECLI:EU:C:2016:322

Inbound citations: 20
•
Cited paragraphs: 10
•
Outbound citations: 47

Keywords

At a glance

Citations by paragraph

Historical distribution of citations

Detailed analytics

Inbound citations

XC unique documents citing • xS citations total to Ks paragraphs

Outbound citations

w3 unique documents cited • MK citations total

© European Union, https://eur-lex.europa.eu, 1998 - 2026

Active Products: EUCJ + ECHR Data Package + Citation Analytics • Documents in DB: 401132 • Paragraphs parsed: 45279850 • Citations processed 3468846