ANDRONICOU AND CONSTANTINOU v. CYPRUSPARTLY DISSENTING OPINION BY MM. C.A. NØRGAARD AND G. JÖRUNDSSON

Doc ref: • ECHR ID:

Document date: May 23, 1996

Doc ref: • ECHR ID:

Document date: May 23, 1996

Cited paragraphs only

PARTLY DISSENTING OPINION BY MM. C.A. NØRGAARD AND G. JÖRUNDSSON

We have voted against the finding of a violation of Article 2 in

the present case for two reasons.

First, the Commission has found that there is no violation of

Article 6 because the applicants had the possibility of bringing a

claim for compensation in a civil case, in other words they had a

remedy which they did not use, therefore we do not find that local

remedies have been exhausted.

Secondly, with regard to the merits of Article 2 we have joined

Mr. Schermers's dissenting opinion.

(Or. English)