Browsing history:

↳
Commission Regulation (EC) No 2181/97 of 3 November 1997 amending Regulation (EC) No 577/97 laying down certain detailed rules for the application of Council Regulation (EC) No 2991/94 laying down standards for spreadable fats and of Council Regulation (EEC) No 1898/87 on the protection of designations used in the marketing of milk and milk products
CASE OF SOKOLOVAS v. LITHUANIA - [Lithuanian Translation] by the Ministry of Justice of the Republic of Lithuania
Council Regulation (EC) No 1828/94 of 25 July 1994 amending Regulation (EEC) No 738/92 imposing a definitive anti-dumping duty on imports of cotton yarn, originating in Brazil and Turkey
Commission Regulation (EC) No 463/2000 of 29 February 2000 opening import quotas in respect of special preferential raw cane sugar from the ACP States for supply to Community refineries in the period 1 March to 30 June 2000
CASE OF JASPER v. THE UNITED KINGDOMDISSENTING OPINION OF JUDGES PALM, FISCHBACH, VAJIĆ, THOMASSEN, TSATSA-NIKOLOVSKA and TRAJA
CASE OF PARDO v. FRANCE (REVISION – ADMISSIBILITY)JOINT DISSENTING OPINION OF JUDGES GÖLCÜKLÜ, PETTITI, PALM AND JUNGWIERT
Commission Regulation (EC) No 996/2002 of 11 June 2002 laying down detailed rules for the application of Council Regulation (EEC) No 2019/93 with regard to supplementary aid in the beef and veal sector for the smaller Aegean islands
Commission Regulation (EC) No 1558/2000 of 17 July 2000 fixing for the 2000/01 marketing year the minimum price to be paid to producers for unprocessed dried figs and the amount of production aid for dried figs
CASE OF BOLDYRYEV AND OTHERS v. UKRAINE - [Ukrainian Translation] by the Ministry of Justice of Ukraine
Commission Regulation (EEC) No 2889/93 of 21 October 1993 laying down certain detailed rules for the application of Regulation (EEC) No 2019/93 as regards the supplements to the special premium for producers of beef and veal and to the premium for maintaining suckler cows

Document text Analytics

CASE OF CHRISTIAN RELIGIOUS ORGANIZATION OF JEHOVAH'S WITNESSES IN THE NKR v. ARMENIACONCURRING OPINION OF JUDGE HARUTYUNYAN

Doc ref: • ECHR ID:

Document date: March 22, 2022

Inbound citations: 0
•
Cited paragraphs: 0
•
Outbound citations: 0

At a glance

Citations by paragraph

Historical distribution of citations

Detailed analytics

© European Union, https://eur-lex.europa.eu, 1998 - 2026

Active Products: EUCJ + ECHR Data Package + Citation Analytics • Documents in DB: 401132 • Paragraphs parsed: 45279850 • Citations processed 3468846