Browsing history:

↳
CASE OF DI PEDE v. ITALYDISSENTING OPINION OF JUDGE MORENILLA
CASE OF DIZMAN v. TURKEYPARTLY DISSENTING OPINION OF JUDGE MULARONI
CASE OF CENTRO EUROPA 7 S.R.L. AND DI STEFANO v. ITALYDISSENTING OPINION OF JUDGE STEINER
Commission Regulation (EC) No 62/2008 of 24 January 2008 on the issuing of export licences for wine-sector products
CASE OF DEWEER v. BELGIUMPARTLY DISSENTING OPINION OF JUDGE PINHEIRO FARINHA
Commission Regulation (EEC) No 70/92 of 13 January 1992 altering the import levies on products processed from cereals and rice
CASE OF USMANOV v. RUSSIAJOINT CONCURRING OPINION OF JUDGES LEMMENS AND RAVARANI
Commission Regulation (EC) No 98/1999 of 15 January 1999 fixing the import duties in the cereals sector
CASE OF İZZETTİN DOĞAN AND OTHERS v. TURKEYJOINT PARTLY DISSENTING AND PARTLY CONCURRING OPINION OF JUDGES VILLIGER, KELLER AND KJØLBRO
Commission Regulation (EC) No 53/2000 of 10 January 2000 fixing the definitive aid for oranges for the 1998/1999 marketing year

Document text Analytics

AFFAIRE H.F. ET AUTRES c. FRANCEJOINT PARTLY DISSENTING OPINION OF JUDGES YUDKIVSKA, WOJTYCZEK AND ROOSMA

Doc ref: • ECHR ID:

Document date: September 14, 2022

Inbound citations: 0
•
Cited paragraphs: 0
•
Outbound citations: 0

At a glance

Citations by paragraph

Historical distribution of citations

Detailed analytics

© European Union, https://eur-lex.europa.eu, 1998 - 2025

Active Products: EUCJ + ECHR Data Package + Citation Analytics • Documents in DB: 401132 • Paragraphs parsed: 45279850 • Citations processed 3468846