CONCURRING OPINION OF JUDGE MIJOVI Ć

As it was emphasis ed i n my previous concurring opinion s in two recent cases, [1] as well as in the joint dissenting opinion in Smyk v. Poland [2] , I see the problem of the refusal of lawyers appointed under legal ‑ a id schemes to represent legally ‑ aided persons on the ground that the claim has no reasonable prospects of success , as the general one, related not only to criminal, but also to both civil and administrative proceedings [3] . To avoid repetition, I refer to the detaile d reasoning of those opinions.

[1] Kulikowski v. Poland and An t onicelli v. Poland , May 19, 2009

[2] July 7, 2009

[3] There are more than 120 such cases pending before the European Court of Human Rights