Lexploria - Legal research enhanced by smart algorithms
Lexploria beta Legal research enhanced by smart algorithms
Menu
Browsing history:

CASE OF HADJITHOMAS AND OTHERS v. TURKEYDISSENTING OPINION OF JUDGE KARAKA Åž

Doc ref:ECHR ID:

Document date: September 22, 2009

  • Inbound citations: 0
  • Cited paragraphs: 0
  • Outbound citations: 0

CASE OF HADJITHOMAS AND OTHERS v. TURKEYDISSENTING OPINION OF JUDGE KARAKA Åž

Doc ref:ECHR ID:

Document date: September 22, 2009

Cited paragraphs only

DISSENTING OPINION OF JUDGE KARAKA Åž

Unlike the majority, I consider that the objection of non-exhaustion of domestic remedies raised by the Government should not have been rejected. Consequently, I cannot agree with the finding of violation s of Article 1 of Protocol No. 1 and Article 8 of the Convention, for the same reasons as those mentioned in my dissenting opinion in the case of Gavriel v. Turkey ( no. 41355/98, 20 January 2009 ) .

© European Union, https://eur-lex.europa.eu, 1998 - 2025

LEXI

Lexploria AI Legal Assistant

Active Products: EUCJ + ECHR Data Package + Citation Analytics • Documents in DB: 400211 • Paragraphs parsed: 44892118 • Citations processed 3448707