DISSENTING OPINION OF JUDGE MIJOVIĆ

As emphasised in my previous concurring/dissenting opinions in seven recent cases [1] , and in the joint dissenting opinion in Smyk v. Poland, I see the problem of the refusal of lawyers appointed under legal-aid schemes to represent a legally-aided person on the ground that the claim has no reasonable prospects of success, as a general one, which affects not only criminal but also civil and administrative proceedings. To avoid repetition, I refer to the detailed reasoning set out in those opinions.

[1] . Kulikowski v. Poland , Antonicelli v. Poland , Arcinski v.Poland, Zapadka v. Poland, Zawadzki v. Poland, Subicka v. Poland and Bakowska v. Poland