Lexploria - Legal research enhanced by smart algorithms
Lexploria beta Legal research enhanced by smart algorithms
Menu
Browsing history:

CASE OF RUSIN v. POLANDJOINT PARTLY DISSENTING OPINION OF

Doc ref:ECHR ID:

Document date: October 2, 2012

  • Inbound citations: 0
  • Cited paragraphs: 0
  • Outbound citations: 0

CASE OF RUSIN v. POLANDJOINT PARTLY DISSENTING OPINION OF

Doc ref:ECHR ID:

Document date: October 2, 2012

Cited paragraphs only

JOINT PARTLY DISSENTING OPINION OF

JUDGES HIRVELÄ AND BIANKU

The instant case raises issues similar to those dealt with by the Court in Moskal v. Poland (no. 10373/05) and Lewandowski v. Poland (38459/03) . The majority in those cases found that there had been a breach of Article 1 of Protocol No. 1 to the Convention. We dissented. We dissent in this case also, for the reasons we gave in our Joint Partly Dissenting Opinion in the Moskal case and in the Lewandowski case.

© European Union, https://eur-lex.europa.eu, 1998 - 2025

LEXI

Lexploria AI Legal Assistant

Active Products: EUCJ + ECHR Data Package + Citation Analytics • Documents in DB: 401132 • Paragraphs parsed: 45279850 • Citations processed 3468846