Lexploria - Legal research enhanced by smart algorithms
Lexploria beta Legal research enhanced by smart algorithms
Menu
Browsing history:

CASE OF ECATERINA MIREA AND OTHERS v. ROMANIADISSENTING OPINION OF JUDGE WOJTYCZEK

Doc ref:ECHR ID:

Document date: April 12, 2016

  • Inbound citations: 0
  • Cited paragraphs: 0
  • Outbound citations: 0

CASE OF ECATERINA MIREA AND OTHERS v. ROMANIADISSENTING OPINION OF JUDGE WOJTYCZEK

Doc ref:ECHR ID:

Document date: April 12, 2016

Cited paragraphs only

DISSENTING OPINION OF JUDGE WOJTYCZEK

I have voted against finding a violation in the instant case for the reasons explained in detail in my separate opinions in the cases of Janowiec and Others v. Russia ([GC], nos. 55508/07 and 29520/09 , ECHR 2013) and Mocanu and Others v. Romania ([GC], nos. 10865/09, 45886/07 and 32431/08 , ECHR 2014 (extracts)). In my opinion, the respondent State is under no obligation to investigate events pre-dating the entry into force of the Convention in respect of that State.

[1] Rectified on 7 December 2016: the text was “ Alexandra Ioana BENDORFEAN”

[2] Rectified on 7 December 2016: the text was “ Cristina CONSTANTIN” .

[3] Rectified on 7 December 2016: the text was “21/11/1984 ” .

© European Union, https://eur-lex.europa.eu, 1998 - 2024
Active Products: EUCJ + ECHR Data Package + Citation Analytics • Documents in DB: 398107 • Paragraphs parsed: 43931842 • Citations processed 3409255