Browsing history:

↳
CASE OF ROMANESCU v. ROMANIADISSENTING OPINION OF JUDGE WOJTYCZEK
CASE OF NEULINGER AND SHURUK v. SWITZERLANDDISSENTING OPINION OF JUDGE SPIELMANN
CASE OF RUDYAK v. UKRAINEJOINT DISSENTING OPINION OF JUDGES POWER-FORDE AND ANTONOVYCH
CASE OF TAZIYEVA AND OTHERS v. RUSSIACONCURRING OPINION OF JUDGES LEMMENS AND DEDOV
CASE OF GÜL v. SWITZERLANDDISSENTING OPINION OF JUDGE MARTENS, APPROVED BY JUDGE RUSSO
CASE OF HESSE v. AUSTRIAJOINT DISSENTING OPINION OF JUDGE S ROZAKIS, TULKENS AND SPIELMANN
CASE OF MARKT INTERN VERLAG GMBH AND KLAUS BEERMANN v. GERMANYINDIVIDUAL DISSENTING OPINION OF JUDGE DE MEYER
CASE OF CHAIR AND J. B. v. GERMANYDISSENTING OPINION OF JUDGE STEINER
Commission Regulation (EEC) No 2602/88 of 19 August 1988 amending Regulation (EEC) No 2415/88 on the sale by tender, for export, of beef held by certain intervention agencies
CASE OF CENTRE OF SOCIETIES FOR KRISHNA CONSCIOUSNESS IN RUSSIA AND FROLOV v. RUSSIA

Document text Analytics

CASE OF VERLAGSGRUPPE DROEMER KNAUR GMBH & CO. KG v. GERMANYDISSENTING OPINION OF JUDGE TSOTSORIA

Doc ref: • ECHR ID:

Document date: October 19, 2017

Inbound citations: 0
•
Cited paragraphs: 0
•
Outbound citations: 0

At a glance

Citations by paragraph

Historical distribution of citations

Detailed analytics

© European Union, https://eur-lex.europa.eu, 1998 - 2026

Active Products: EUCJ + ECHR Data Package + Citation Analytics • Documents in DB: 401132 • Paragraphs parsed: 45279850 • Citations processed 3468846