LEXI - AI Legal Assistant
Sorry, there was an error communicating with our API.
Try refreshing the page, and if the error persists, please try again in a few minutes.
CASE OF B. v. AUSTRIACONCURRING OPINION OF JUDGE CREMONA
Doc ref: • ECHR ID:
Document date: March 28, 1990
- Inbound citations: 0
- •
- Cited paragraphs: 0
- •
- Outbound citations: 0
CASE OF B. v. AUSTRIACONCURRING OPINION OF JUDGE CREMONA
Doc ref: • ECHR ID:
Document date: March 28, 1990
Cited paragraphs only
CONCURRING OPINION OF JUDGE CREMONA
I have had some hesitation as to the conclusion reached under
Article 5 § 3 (art. 5-3) of the Convention, and I say this because
the period of time involved was rather long.
But each case must be decided on its own merits. On the whole,
considering that in this case danger of absconding was very real and
subsisted up to the pronouncement of the Regional Court's judgment,
during which period the authorities concerned did not fail to display
the necessary diligence in the conduct of proceedings in this very
complex case, and weighing up the other relevant circumstances
referred to in the judgment, I have, along with my other colleagues,
voted for non-violation under this head.
© European Union,
https://eur-lex.europa.eu, 1998 - 2025
