Browsing history:

↳
CASE OF BULUT v. AUSTRIAPARTLY DISSENTIN G OPINION OF JUDGE MORENILLA
CASE OF KHLAIFIA AND OTHERS v. ITALYCONCURRING OPINION OF JUDGE KELLER
CASES OF NAKACH AND SCHENKEL AGAINST THE NETHERLANDS
CASE OF KLIBISZ AGAINST POLAND
Commission Regulation (EC) No 523/1999 of 9 March 1999 determining the percentage of quantities covered by applications for export licences for poultrymeat which may be accepted
Commission Regulation (EC) No 1924/95 of 3 August 1995 laying down transitional measures for the application of the tariff quota arrangements for imports of bananas as a result of the accession of Austria, Finland and Sweden
CASE OF SÜVEGES v. HUNGARYPARTLY DISSENTING OPINION OF JUDGE WOJTYCZEK
Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 32/2013 of 17 January 2013 amending Regulation (EC) No 1484/95 as regards representative prices in the poultrymeat and egg sectors and for egg albumin
CASE OF GÖÇ v. TURKEYJOINT CONCURRING OPINION OF JUDGES MAKARCZYK
Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 15 December 2011. Rastelli Davide e C. Snc v Jean-Charles Hidoux.

Document text Analytics

CASE OF LOBO MACHADO v. PORTUGALCONCURRING OPINION OF JUDGE LOPES ROCHA

Doc ref: • ECHR ID:

Document date: February 20, 1996

Inbound citations: 0
•
Cited paragraphs: 0
•
Outbound citations: 0

At a glance

Citations by paragraph

Historical distribution of citations

Detailed analytics

© European Union, https://eur-lex.europa.eu, 1998 - 2025

Active Products: EUCJ + ECHR Data Package + Citation Analytics • Documents in DB: 401132 • Paragraphs parsed: 45279850 • Citations processed 3468846