CONCURRING OPINION OF JUDGE MIJOVIĆ

As emphasised i n my previous concurring/dissenting opinions in six recent cases [1] , and in the joint dissenting opinion in Smyk v. Poland , I see the problem of the refusal of lawyers appointed under legal-aid schemes to represent legally-aided persons on the ground that the claim has no reasonable prospects of success, as a general one, related not only to criminal but also to both civil and administrative proceedings. To avoid repetition, I refer to the detailed reasoning of those opinions.

[1] 1 . Kulikowski v. Poland , no. 18353/03, ECHR 2009 ‑ … (extracts) ; Antonicelli v. Poland , no. 2815/05, 19 May 2009; ArciÅ„ski v. Poland , no. 41373/04, 15 September 2009; Zapadka v. Poland , no. 2619/05 , 15 December 2009; Jan Zawadzki v. Poland , no. 648/02 , 6 July 2010 and BÄ…kowska v. Poland , no. 33539/02 , 12 January 2010.