Lexploria - Legal research enhanced by smart algorithms
Lexploria beta Legal research enhanced by smart algorithms
Menu
Browsing history:

CASE OF FEDOTOVA AND OTHERS v. RUSSIAJOINT PARTLY DISSENTING OPINION OF JUDGES LEMMENS AND ZÃœND

Doc ref:ECHR ID:

Document date: July 13, 2021

  • Inbound citations: 0
  • Cited paragraphs: 0
  • Outbound citations: 0

CASE OF FEDOTOVA AND OTHERS v. RUSSIAJOINT PARTLY DISSENTING OPINION OF JUDGES LEMMENS AND ZÃœND

Doc ref:ECHR ID:

Document date: July 13, 2021

Cited paragraphs only

JOINT PARTLY DISSENTING OPINION OF JUDGES LEMMENS AND ZÃœND

We fully agree with the main conclusions of the judgment.

To our regret, however, we are unable to join the majority insofar as they reject the applicants’ claim for reimbursement of costs and expenses (see paragraph 64 of the judgment and operative point 6).

In our opinion, the invoices submitted by the Geneva lawyers (see paragraph 62 of the judgment) constitute a sufficient “basis on which to accept that the costs and expenses claimed have actually been incurred” (see paragraph 64 of the judgment). It may well be that under Russian law, for an invoice to be enforceable, there must be a legal-service contract between a lawyer and his or her client. However, the Court is not bound by rules of domestic law. In particular in the present case, where the applicants had sought the services of lawyers practising in a country other than Russia, we find it inappropriate to reject their claim on the basis of reasoning consonant with a procedure which is common in Russia, but not necessarily in other countries.

We are aware that the majority in this case follow the approach adopted by the Court in Alekseyev and Others v. Russia (nos. 14988/09 and 50 others, § 32, 27 November 2018), with regard to the same lawyers. With all due respect to the Court, we believe that the approach in that case was not justified either.

Appendix

No.

Application no.

Case name

Lodged on

Applicant, Year of Birth Place of Residence

1.

40792/10

Fedotova and Shipitko v. Russia

20/07/2010

Irina Borisovna FEDOTOVA

1978 Schifflange, Luxembourg

Irina Vladimirovna SHIPITKO

1977 Sochi, Russia

2.

30538/14

Chunosov and Yevtushenko v. Russia

05/04/2014

Dmitriy Nikolayevich CHUNOSOV

1984 Lüneburg, Germany

Yaroslav Nikolayevich YEVTUSHENKO

1994 Sonchino, Russia

3.

43439/14

Shaykhraznova and Yakovleva v. Russia

17/05/2014

Ilmira Mansurovna SHAYKHRAZNOVA

1991 Wetzlar, Germany

Yelena Mikhaylovna YAKOVLEVA

1990 Gryazi, Russia

© European Union, https://eur-lex.europa.eu, 1998 - 2024
Active Products: EUCJ + ECHR Data Package + Citation Analytics • Documents in DB: 398107 • Paragraphs parsed: 43931842 • Citations processed 3409255