JOINT SEPARATE OPINION OF JUDGES LAGERGREN, PINHEIRO FARINHA, PETTITI, MACDONALD, DE MEYER AND VALTICOS

The views expressed in our joint separate opinion concerning the case of W v. the United Kingdom [1] also apply to the present case.

JOINT SEPARATE OPINION OF JUDGES PINHEIRO FARINHA, PETTITI , DE MEYER AND VALTICOS

The remark made in paragraph 1 of our joint separate opinion concerning the case of W v. the United Kingdom [2] also applies to the present case.

JOINT SEPARATE OPINION OF JUDGES PINHEIRO FARINHA AND DE MEYER

The views expressed in our joint separate opinion concerning the case of W v. the United Kingdom [3] also apply, mutatis mutandis, to the present case.

As far as this case is concerned, we also consider that there was a violation of the applicant ’ s right to respect for his family life:

( i ) in that he was not duly consulted, heard and informed as regards the measure taken in February 1978 (§ 11 of the judgment);

(ii) in that it has not been shown that he was duly consulted, heard and informed as regards the measure imposed on him in July 1979 (§ 14 of the judgment).