JOINT DISSENTING OPINION OF JUDGES BINDSCHEDLER-ROBERT, MATSCHER AND BERNHARDT ON THE APPLICABILITY OF ARTICLE 6 (art. 6)

(Translation)

For the reasons indicated in the dissenting opinions we expressed in the Öztürk case, we are unfortunately not able to endorse the judgment of the Court; we continue to take the view that in a case of this kind Article 6 (art. 6) of the Convention is not applicable.

[*]  Note by the Registrar: The case is numbered 8/1986/106/154.  The second figure indicates the year in which the case was referred to the Court and the first figure its place on the list of cases referred in that year; the last two figures indicate, respectively, the case's order on the list of cases and of originating applications (to the Commission) referred to the Court since its creation.