Lexploria - Legal research enhanced by smart algorithms
Lexploria beta Legal research enhanced by smart algorithms
Menu
Browsing history:

CASE OF JERSILD v. DENMARKSUPPLEMENTARY JOINT DISSENT ING OPINION OF JUDGES GÖLCÜKLÜ AND VALTICOS

Doc ref:ECHR ID:

Document date: September 23, 1994

  • Inbound citations: 0
  • Cited paragraphs: 0
  • Outbound citations: 0

CASE OF JERSILD v. DENMARKSUPPLEMENTARY JOINT DISSENT ING OPINION OF JUDGES GÖLCÜKLÜ AND VALTICOS

Doc ref:ECHR ID:

Document date: September 23, 1994

Cited paragraphs only

SUPPLEMENTARY JOINT DISSENT ING OPINION OF JUDGES GÖLCÜKLÜ AND VALTICOS

(Translation)

We have voted against point 2 of the operative provisions of the judgment because we are so firmly convinced that the applicant was wrong not to react against the defence of racism that we consider it wholly unjustified to award him any compensation whatever.

[*]  Note by the Registrar.  The case is numbered 36/1993/431/510. The first number is the case's position on the list of cases referred to the Court in the relevant year (second number).  The last two numbers indicate the case's position on the list of cases referred to the Court since its creation and on the list of the corresponding originating applications to the Commission.

[*]  Note by the Registrar.  For practical reasons this annex will appear only with the printed version of the judgment (volume 298 of Series A of the Publications of the Court), but a copy of the Commission's report is obtainable from the registry.

© European Union, https://eur-lex.europa.eu, 1998 - 2025

LEXI

Lexploria AI Legal Assistant

Active Products: EUCJ + ECHR Data Package + Citation Analytics • Documents in DB: 401132 • Paragraphs parsed: 45279850 • Citations processed 3468846