Lexploria - Legal research enhanced by smart algorithms
Lexploria beta Legal research enhanced by smart algorithms
Menu
Browsing history:

CASE OF SCHULER-ZGRAGGEN v. SWITZERLAND (ARTICLE 50)JOINT DISSENTING OPINION OF JUDGES BERNHARDT AND WILDHABER

Doc ref:ECHR ID:

Document date: January 31, 1995

  • Inbound citations: 0
  • Cited paragraphs: 0
  • Outbound citations: 0

CASE OF SCHULER-ZGRAGGEN v. SWITZERLAND (ARTICLE 50)JOINT DISSENTING OPINION OF JUDGES BERNHARDT AND WILDHABER

Doc ref:ECHR ID:

Document date: January 31, 1995

Cited paragraphs only

JOINT DISSENTING OPINION OF JUDGES BERNHARDT AND WILDHABER

We have voted against the decision to award interest since we are convinced that the pension finally granted and paid for the applicant ’ s benefit constitutes sufficient compensation and that no additional payment of interest is required.

[*]  The case is numbered 17/1992/362/436.  The first number is the case's position on the list of cases referred to the Court in the relevant year (second number).  The last two numbers indicate the case's position on the list of cases referred to the Court since its creation and on the list of the corresponding originating applications to the Commission.

[*]   Rules A apply to all cases referred to the Court before the entry into force of Protocol No. 9 (P9) and thereafter only to cases concerning States not bound by that Protocol (P9).  They correspond to the Rules that came into force on 1 January 1983 , as amended several times subsequently.

© European Union, https://eur-lex.europa.eu, 1998 - 2024
Active Products: EUCJ + ECHR Data Package + Citation Analytics • Documents in DB: 398107 • Paragraphs parsed: 43931842 • Citations processed 3409255