Lexploria - Legal research enhanced by smart algorithms
Lexploria beta Legal research enhanced by smart algorithms
Menu
Browsing history:

CASE OF AKDİVAR AND OTHERS v. TURKEY (ARTICLE 50)DISSENTING OPINION OF JUDGE GÖLCÜKLÜ

Doc ref:ECHR ID:

Document date: April 1, 1998

  • Inbound citations: 0
  • Cited paragraphs: 0
  • Outbound citations: 0

CASE OF AKDİVAR AND OTHERS v. TURKEY (ARTICLE 50)DISSENTING OPINION OF JUDGE GÖLCÜKLÜ

Doc ref:ECHR ID:

Document date: April 1, 1998

Cited paragraphs only

DISSENTING OPINION OF JUDGE GÖLCÜKLÜ

( Translation )

As I voted for non-exhaustion of domestic remedies in the principal judgment, I am dispensed from examining this case under Article 50 of the Convention.

[1] . This summary by the registry does not bind the Court.

[2] Notes by the Registrar

. The case is numbered 99 / 1995 / 605 / 693 . The first number is the case’s position on the list of cases referred to the Court in the relevant year (second number). The last two numbers indicate the case’s position on the list of cases referred to the Court since its creation and on the list of the corresponding originating applications to the Commission.

[3] . Rules of Court A apply to all cases referred to the Court before the entry into force of Protocol No. 9 (1 October 1994) and thereafter only to cases concerning States not bound by that Protocol. They correspond to the Rules that came into force on 1 January 1983, as amended several times subsequently.

© European Union, https://eur-lex.europa.eu, 1998 - 2024
Active Products: EUCJ + ECHR Data Package + Citation Analytics • Documents in DB: 398107 • Paragraphs parsed: 43931842 • Citations processed 3409255