Lexploria - Legal research enhanced by smart algorithms
Lexploria beta Legal research enhanced by smart algorithms
Menu
Browsing history:

CASE OF XENIDES-ARESTIS v. TURKEYDISSENTING OPINION OF JUDGE TÃœRMEN

Doc ref:ECHR ID:

Document date: December 22, 2005

  • Inbound citations: 0
  • Cited paragraphs: 0
  • Outbound citations: 0

CASE OF XENIDES-ARESTIS v. TURKEYDISSENTING OPINION OF JUDGE TÃœRMEN

Doc ref:ECHR ID:

Document date: December 22, 2005

Cited paragraphs only

DISSENTING OPINION OF JUDGE TÃœRMEN

I disagree with the majority concerning the violations of Article 8 of the Convention and Article 1 of Protocol No. 1 for the reasons contained in the separate dissenting opinions of Judge Bernhardt joined by Judge Lopes Rocha and of Judges Baka, Jambrek , Pettiti and Gölcüklü in the Loizidou v. Turkey (merits) judgment of 18 December 1996.

© European Union, https://eur-lex.europa.eu, 1998 - 2024
Active Products: EUCJ + ECHR Data Package + Citation Analytics • Documents in DB: 398107 • Paragraphs parsed: 43931842 • Citations processed 3409255