Lexploria - Legal research enhanced by smart algorithms
Lexploria beta Legal research enhanced by smart algorithms
Menu
Browsing history:

CASE OF BROSSET-TRIBOULET AND OTHERS v. FRANCEPARTLY DISSENTING OPINION OF JUDGE KOVLER

Doc ref:ECHR ID:

Document date: March 29, 2010

  • Inbound citations: 0
  • Cited paragraphs: 0
  • Outbound citations: 0

CASE OF BROSSET-TRIBOULET AND OTHERS v. FRANCEPARTLY DISSENTING OPINION OF JUDGE KOVLER

Doc ref:ECHR ID:

Document date: March 29, 2010

Cited paragraphs only

PARTLY DISSENTING OPINION OF JUDGE KOVLER

( Translation )

For the same reasons as those expressed in my dissenting opinion in the case of Depalle , I deplore the fact that the Court discarded the question of the applicability of Article 8 in the present case too quickly .

[1] . “ Et quidem naturali jure communia sunt omnium haec : aer et aqua profluens et mare et per hoc litora maris ” : And, in accordance with natural law, air, flowing water, the sea and , accordingly, the seashore are common property belonging to everyone (Institutes of Justinien, Book II, Tit le I De rerum divisione ).

© European Union, https://eur-lex.europa.eu, 1998 - 2024
Active Products: EUCJ + ECHR Data Package + Citation Analytics • Documents in DB: 398107 • Paragraphs parsed: 43931842 • Citations processed 3409255