SCHULER-ZGRAGGEN v. SWITZERLANDDISSENTING OPINION OF MRS. G.H. THUNE

Doc ref: • ECHR ID:

Document date: April 7, 1992

Doc ref: • ECHR ID:

Document date: April 7, 1992

Cited paragraphs only

DISSENTING OPINION OF MR. C.L. ROZAKIS

I agree with the dissenting opinion of Mr. Frowein and Sir Basil

Hall in so far as they conclude that there has been a violation of

Article 6 para. 1 of the Convention in view of the fact that the

applicant did not have an oral hearing.

DISSENTING OPINION OF MRS. G.H. THUNE

I agree with the dissenting opinion of Mr. Frowein and Sir Basil

Hall in so far as they conclude that there has been a violation of

Article 14 of the Convention taken together with Article 6 in respect

of discrimination on account of the applicant's sex.

APPENDIX I

HISTORY OF PROCEEDINGS

Date Item

_________________________________________________________________

29 December 1988 Introduction of the application

9 January 1989 Registration of the application

Examination of Admissibility

2 April 1990 Commission's decision to invite

the Government to submit observations

on the admissibility and merits of the

application

26 June 1990 Government's observations

10 September 1990 Applicant's observations in reply

7 December 1990 Commission's decision to hold an oral

hearing

30 May 1991 Oral hearing on admissibility and

merits, Commission's decision to

declare the application in part

admissible and in part inadmissible

Examination of the merits

12 October 1991 Commission's consideration of the

state of proceedings

18 February 1992 Commission's deliberations on the

merits and final vote

30 March 1992 Commission's deliberations on the

merits

7 April 1992 Adoption of the Report

Lexploria AI Legal Assistant