Lexploria - Legal research enhanced by smart algorithms
Lexploria beta Legal research enhanced by smart algorithms
Menu
Browsing history:

KLASS v. GERMANYCONCURRING OPINION BY Mr. E. BUSUTTIL

Doc ref:ECHR ID:

Document date: May 21, 1992

  • Inbound citations: 0
  • Cited paragraphs: 0
  • Outbound citations: 0

KLASS v. GERMANYCONCURRING OPINION BY Mr. E. BUSUTTIL

Doc ref:ECHR ID:

Document date: May 21, 1992

Cited paragraphs only

               DISSENTING OPINION BY Mr. M.P. PELLONPÄÄ

      I consider that, in respect of the first applicant, there was a

violation not of Article 3 but of Article 8 of the Convention for the

reasons indicated in the dissenting opinion of Mr. Nørgaard and others.

                 CONCURRING OPINION BY Mr. E. BUSUTTIL

      I have voted for a violation of Article 3 in this case on the

basis that the first applicant's treatment by the police amounted to

degrading treatment.

      In my view, the treatment accorded to her did not attain the

level of severity required to bring it within the ambit of inhuman

treatment as interpreted in the case-law of the Convention organs.  On

the other hand, it is clear to me that she was subjected to humiliating

treatment in the presence of her eight-year-old daughter and eventually

hand-cuffed for resisting the police, which the Detmold Public

Prosecutor's Office later considered to be a minor offence attracting

no public interest in prosecution.

                              APPENDIX I

                        HISTORY OF PROCEEDINGS

Date                             Item

_________________________________________________________________

11 July 1989                     Introduction of the application

11 September 1989                Registration of the application

Examination of admissibility

14 February 1990                 Commission's decision to invite

                                 the Government to submit observations

                                 on the admissibility and merits of

                                 the application

28 May, 22 August 1990           Government's observations

28 August 1990                   Applicant's observations in reply

7 March 1991                     Commission's decision to hold an oral

                                 hearing

9 July 1991                      Oral hearing on admissibility and

                                 merits, Commission's decisions to

                                 declare the application admissible

                                 and that no action is required with

                                 regard to complaint under

                                 Article 25 para. 1 in fine of the

                                 Convention

Examination of the merits

18 July 1991,         )          Commission's consideration of the

4 April 1992          )          state of proceedings

12 May 1992                      Commission's deliberations on the

                                 merits and final votes

21 May 1992                      Adoption of the Report

© European Union, https://eur-lex.europa.eu, 1998 - 2026

LEXI

Lexploria AI Legal Assistant

Active Products: EUCJ + ECHR Data Package + Citation Analytics • Documents in DB: 401132 • Paragraphs parsed: 45279850 • Citations processed 3468846