KLASS v. GERMANYCONCURRING OPINION BY Mr. E. BUSUTTIL
Doc ref: • ECHR ID:
Document date: May 21, 1992
- Inbound citations: 0
- •
- Cited paragraphs: 0
- •
- Outbound citations: 0
DISSENTING OPINION BY Mr. M.P. PELLONPÄÄ
I consider that, in respect of the first applicant, there was a
violation not of Article 3 but of Article 8 of the Convention for the
reasons indicated in the dissenting opinion of Mr. Nørgaard and others.
CONCURRING OPINION BY Mr. E. BUSUTTIL
I have voted for a violation of Article 3 in this case on the
basis that the first applicant's treatment by the police amounted to
degrading treatment.
In my view, the treatment accorded to her did not attain the
level of severity required to bring it within the ambit of inhuman
treatment as interpreted in the case-law of the Convention organs. On
the other hand, it is clear to me that she was subjected to humiliating
treatment in the presence of her eight-year-old daughter and eventually
hand-cuffed for resisting the police, which the Detmold Public
Prosecutor's Office later considered to be a minor offence attracting
no public interest in prosecution.
APPENDIX I
HISTORY OF PROCEEDINGS
Date Item
_________________________________________________________________
11 July 1989 Introduction of the application
11 September 1989 Registration of the application
Examination of admissibility
14 February 1990 Commission's decision to invite
the Government to submit observations
on the admissibility and merits of
the application
28 May, 22 August 1990 Government's observations
28 August 1990 Applicant's observations in reply
7 March 1991 Commission's decision to hold an oral
hearing
9 July 1991 Oral hearing on admissibility and
merits, Commission's decisions to
declare the application admissible
and that no action is required with
regard to complaint under
Article 25 para. 1 in fine of the
Convention
Examination of the merits
18 July 1991, ) Commission's consideration of the
4 April 1992 ) state of proceedings
12 May 1992 Commission's deliberations on the
merits and final votes
21 May 1992 Adoption of the Report
LEXI - AI Legal Assistant
