HEYDASCH v. GERMANYDISSENTING OPINION OF SIR BASIL HALL

Doc ref: • ECHR ID:

Document date: April 6, 1993

Doc ref: • ECHR ID:

Document date: April 6, 1993

Cited paragraphs only

DISSENTING OPINION OF SIR BASIL HALL

This case differs from comparable cases considered by the Court

and the Commission in that the investigation of a suspected offence has

been terminated without any charge against the applicant having been

formulated. Furthermore a ground for the termination was the length

of time the investigation had so far taken.

In these circumstances I do not consider that there has been a

violation of the right conferred by Article 6 that in the determination

of a criminal charge against him everyone is entitled to a hearing

within a reasonable time.

Lexploria AI Legal Assistant