STRAN GREEK REFINERIES S.A. AND ANDREADIS v. GREECEPARTIALLY DISSENTING OPINION OF MR. STEFAN TRECHSEL
Doc ref: • ECHR ID:
Document date: May 12, 1993
- 0 Inbound citations:
- •
- 0 Cited paragraphs:
- •
- 0 Outbound citations:
PARTIALLY DISSENTING OPINION OF MR. STEFAN TRECHSEL
AND SIR BASIL HALL
We are not in agreement with the majority of the Commission that
there has been no violation of Article 6 para. 1 in relation to the
length of proceedings in this case. The situation on 20 November 1985,
when the Declaration of Greece under Article 25 took effect, was that
the Government were challenging the validity of the arbitration award.
The Government were contending that the arbitration award was invalid
notwithstanding that they had referred the dispute to arbitration
themselves.
Both the Athens first instance court and the court of appeal
rejected the Government's contention, the proceedings at two instances
taking 18 months (of which just under twelve months elapsed after the
Greek Declaration under Article 25).
On 15 December 1986 the Government appealed to the Court of
cassation. The final decision of the Court of cassation was the
judgment of its First Chamber on 11 April 1990 - more than three years
later.
The majority of the Commission conclude that the complexity of
the issues justified the time taken. We do not agree that the issues
were so complex as to justify the delay. The issue was in our view a
simple point of law which it had not taken long for the courts of first
and second instance to resolve. The time taken appears to have resulted
in part from the structural arrangements of the Court of cassation
which resulted in reference from the First Chamber to the Plenary Court
and back again. It was in part a result of the need to consider new
legislation, law 1901/1987 taking effect while the appeal in cassation
was pending. Those are matters of State responsibility.
In our view the determination of the applicants' civil rights in
relation to the arbitration award was not made within a reasonable
time, and there was a violation of Article 6 para. 1.
In other respects we are in agreement with the conclusions of the
Commission.
(Or. English)