Lexploria - Legal research enhanced by smart algorithms
Lexploria beta Legal research enhanced by smart algorithms
Menu
Browsing history:

X, Y and Z v. THE UNITED KINGDOMDISSENTING OPINION OF MR. L. LOUCAIDES

Doc ref:ECHR ID:

Document date: June 27, 1995

  • Inbound citations: 0
  • Cited paragraphs: 0
  • Outbound citations: 0

X, Y and Z v. THE UNITED KINGDOMDISSENTING OPINION OF MR. L. LOUCAIDES

Doc ref:ECHR ID:

Document date: June 27, 1995

Cited paragraphs only

                DISSENTING OPINION OF MR. L. LOUCAIDES

      I have voted against a finding of a violation of Article 8 in the

present case substantially for the reasons set out in para. 1 of the

dissenting opinion of Mr. Danelius and in paras. 8-13 of the dissenting

opinion of Mrs. Liddy.

      I must add that I was also particularly influenced by the fact

that on the basis of the material placed before the Commission, adverse

effects on the personality and development of children due to their

bringing up in atypical families such as that of the applicants cannot

be excluded.

                                                        (Or. English)

© European Union, https://eur-lex.europa.eu, 1998 - 2024
Active Products: EUCJ + ECHR Data Package + Citation Analytics • Documents in DB: 398107 • Paragraphs parsed: 43931842 • Citations processed 3409255