M.S. v. SWEDENSEPARATE OPINION OF MR. S. TRECHSEL

Doc ref: • ECHR ID:

Document date: April 11, 1996

Doc ref: • ECHR ID:

Document date: April 11, 1996

Cited paragraphs only

SEPARATE OPINION OF MR. S. TRECHSEL

In the present case I fully agree with the opinion of

Mr. Danelius. With regard to the issue raised by the applicant under

Article 8, I accept that there existed an arguable claim and therefore

conclude that Article 13 applied but was not complied with.

(Or. English)