Lexploria - Legal research enhanced by smart algorithms
Lexploria beta Legal research enhanced by smart algorithms
Menu
Browsing history:

A.P., M.P. and T.P. v. SWITZERLANDDISSENTING OPINION OF MR. M.P. PELLONPÄÄ

Doc ref:ECHR ID:

Document date: April 18, 1996

  • Inbound citations: 0
  • Cited paragraphs: 0
  • Outbound citations: 0

A.P., M.P. and T.P. v. SWITZERLANDDISSENTING OPINION OF MR. M.P. PELLONPÄÄ

Doc ref:ECHR ID:

Document date: April 18, 1996

Cited paragraphs only

           DISSENTING OPINION OF MR. M.P. PELLONPÄÄ

        (regarding Article 6 para. 1 of the Convention)

     I have voted against the finding of a violation of Article 6

para. 1 of the Convention on the ground that, for the reasons mentioned

in the dissenting opinion of MM. G. Jörundsson and J.-C. Geus, an oral

hearing was in any case not required by the provision in question.

     In view of this, I do not find necessary to decide whether

Article 6 is applicable as regards this part of the present case.

                                                 (Or. English)

© European Union, https://eur-lex.europa.eu, 1998 - 2026

LEXI

Lexploria AI Legal Assistant

Active Products: EUCJ + ECHR Data Package + Citation Analytics • Documents in DB: 401132 • Paragraphs parsed: 45279850 • Citations processed 3468846