GÜNDEM v. TURKEYPARTLY DISSENTING OPINION OF MRS. G.H. THUNE
Doc ref: • ECHR ID:
Document date: September 3, 1996
- Inbound citations: 0
- •
- Cited paragraphs: 0
- •
- Outbound citations: 0
PARTLY DISSENTING OPINION OF MRS. G.H. THUNE
AND MR. N. BRATZA
For substantially the same reasons as those set out in the
separate opinion of Mr. Bratza in Application No. 21893/93, Akdivar and
Others v. Turkey, we consider that there has been a violation of
Article 13 and not of Article 6 in the present case. We emphasise again
the particular importance which we attach to the role of Article 13 in
the context of the events in South-East Turkey for the reasons given
in the partly dissenting opinion of Mrs. Thune in Application No.
23178/94, Sükran Aydin v. Turkey.
In all other respects we agree with the conclusions and reasoning
of the majority of the Commission.