SELCUK and ASKER v. TurkeyPARTLY DISSENTING OPINION OF N. BRATZA
Doc ref: • ECHR ID:
Document date: November 28, 1996
- 0 Inbound citations:
- •
- 0 Cited paragraphs:
- •
- 0 Outbound citations:
PARTLY DISSENTING OPINION OF N. BRATZA
For substantially the reasons given in my separate opinions in other
cases involving the destruction of villages in South-Eastern Turkey
(notably Akdivar and Others and Mentes and Others) I see the essential
problem in these cases is concerned not with the right of access to court
but rather with the effectiveness of the remedies available (including
court remedies) under domestic law in the particular circumstances
prevailing in that part of Turkey. While thus agreeing with the
essential reasoning of the majority of the Commission in paragraphs 194 -
196 of the Report, I voted in favour of a violation of Article 13 and
not of Article 6 of the Convention.
(Or. français)