PARTLY DISSENTING OPINION OF MR. S. TRECHSEL, MRS. J. LIDDY

      AND MM. B. MARXER, N. BRATZA, G. RESS AND K. HERNDL

     We have voted against the conclusion in para. 63 because we are

of the opinion that the Commission also ought to have found a violation

of Article 6 para. 1 and para. 3 (b) and (c) combined. In our view it

cannot be argued that half an hour is enough time for a lawyer to

prepare the defence, even if the case is not entirely new to him. We

cannot, therefore, agree with the conclusion that such a serious denial

of the right to an effective defence can be cured on appeal.