CASE OF CRAVCENCO AGAINST THE REPUBLIC OF MOLDOVA AND 6 OTHER CASES
Doc ref: 13012/02;27581/04;17328/04;35967/03;16000/10;44964/05;27516/04 • ECHR ID: 001-222371
Document date: December 14, 2022
- Inbound citations: 30
- •
- Cited paragraphs: 0
- •
- Outbound citations: 0
Resolution CM/ResDH(2022)400
Execution of the judgments of the European Court of Human Rights
Seven cases against the Republic of Moldova
(Adopted by the Committee of Ministers on 14 December 2022 at the 1452 nd meeting of the Ministers’ Deputies)
Application No.
Case
Judgment of
Final on
13012/02
CRAVCENCO
15/01/2008
15/04/2008
27581/04
BOBOC
04/11/2008
04/02/2009
17328/04
DESERVIRE S.R.L.
06/10/2009
06/01/2010
35967/03
GUSOVSCHI
13/11/2007
31/03/2008
16000/10
IALTEXGAL AURICA S.A.
16/02/2021
16/02/2021
44964/05
OCULIST AND IMAS
28/06/2011
28/06/2011
27516/04
PANZARI
29/09/2009
01/03/2010
The Committee of Ministers, under the terms of Article 46, paragraph 2, of the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms, which provides that the Committee supervises the execution of final judgments of the European Court of Human Rights (hereinafter “the Convention” and “the Court”),
Having regard to the final judgments transmitted by the Court to the Committee in these cases and to the violations established on account of excessive length of civil proceedings and lack of an effective remedy;
Recalling the respondent State’s obligation, under Article 46, paragraph 1, of the Convention, to abide by all final judgments in cases to which it has been a party and that this obligation entails, over and above the payment of any sums awarded by the Court, the adoption by the authorities of the respondent State, where required:
- of individual measures to put an end to violations established and erase their consequences so as to achieve as far as possible restitutio in integrum ; and
- of general measures preventing similar violations;
Having invited the government of the respondent State to inform the Committee of the measures taken to comply with the above-mentioned obligation;
Having examined the action report provided by the government indicating the measures adopted to give effect to the judgments including the information provided regarding the payment of the just satisfaction awarded by the Court (see document DH-DD(2022)1338 );
Noting that the general measures related to the implementation of the domestic remedy continue to be examined in the framework of the Olaru and Others group of cases (Application No. 476/07);
Having satisfied itself that all the measures required by Article 46, paragraph 1, have been adopted,
DECLARES that it has exercised its functions under Article 46, paragraph 2, of the Convention in these cases and
DECIDES to close the examination thereof.