Search
document

Document text Analytics

CASE OF COJOACA AGAINST ROMANIA AND 5 OTHER CASES

Doc ref: 19548/04;28686/04;35049/08;16986/12;80529/13;73352/14 • ECHR ID: 001-214818

Document date: December 2, 2021

Inbound citations: 20
•
Cited paragraphs: 0
•
Outbound citations: 0

CASE OF COJOACA AGAINST ROMANIA AND 5 OTHER CASES

Doc ref: 19548/04;28686/04;35049/08;16986/12;80529/13;73352/14 • ECHR ID: 001-214818

Document date: December 2, 2021

Cited paragraphs only

Resolution CM/ResDH(2021)332

Execution of the judgments of the European Court of Human Rights

Six cases against Romania

(Adopted by the Committee of Ministers on 2 December 2021

at the 1419 th meeting of the Ministers' Deputies)

Application No.

Case

Judgment of

Final on

19548/04

COJOACÄ‚

26/11/2013

26/02/2014

28686/04

AKBAR

05/04/2011

35049/08

SERCE

30/06/2015

30/09/2015

16986/12

ALEXANDRU ENACHE

03/10/2017

03/01/2018

80529/13

EZE

21/06/2016

21/09/2016

73352/14

BUȘCU

20/04/2021

The Committee of Ministers, under the terms of Article 46, paragraph 2, of the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms, which provides that the Committee supervises the execution of final judgments of the European Court of Human Rights (hereinafter “the Convention” and “the Court”,

Having regard to the final judgments transmitted by the Court to the Committee in these cases and to the violations of Article 3 of the Convention established due to overcrowding and poor material conditions in prisons;

Recalling the respondent State’s obligation, under Article 46, paragraph 1, of the Convention, to abide by all final judgments in cases to which it has been a party and that this obligation entails, over and above the payment of any sums awarded by the Court, the adoption by the authorities of the respondent State, where required:

- of individual measures to put an end to violations established and erase their consequences so as to achieve as far as possible restitutio in integrum ; and

- of general measures preventing similar violations;

Having invited the government of the respondent State to inform the Committee of the measures taken to comply with the above-mentioned obligation;

Having noted the information provided regarding the applicants’ situation and that regarding the payment of the just satisfaction awarded by the Court;

Considering that the question of individual measures was resolved, given that the applicants have ceased serving their prison sentence and that the just satisfaction was paid to them;

Recalling that the question of the general measures required to guarantee non-repetition of the violations found continues to be examined within the framework of the Bragadireanu v. Romania group of cases and that the closure of these cases therefore in no way prejudges the Committee’s evaluation of the general measures;

DECLARES that it has exercised its functions under Article 46, paragraph 2, of the Convention in these cases as regards the individual measures and

DECIDES to close the examination of these cases.

LEXI

Lexploria AI Legal Assistant