Lexploria - Legal research enhanced by smart algorithms
Lexploria beta Legal research enhanced by smart algorithms
Menu
Browsing history:

FRĄCKOWIAK-MITURA v. POLAND and 3 other applications

Doc ref: 21998/21;22918/21;24398/21;25545/21 • ECHR ID: 001-217083

Document date: March 31, 2022

  • Inbound citations: 0
  • Cited paragraphs: 0
  • Outbound citations: 1

FRĄCKOWIAK-MITURA v. POLAND and 3 other applications

Doc ref: 21998/21;22918/21;24398/21;25545/21 • ECHR ID: 001-217083

Document date: March 31, 2022

Cited paragraphs only

Published on 19 April 2022

FIRST SECTION

Application no. 21998/21 Małgorzata FRĄCKOWIAK-MITURA against Poland and 3 other applications (see list appended) communicated on 31 March 2022

SUBJECT MATTER OF THE CASE

The applicants are judges who applied for a vacancy at the Słupsk Regional Court published on 5 March 2018 in the Monitor Polski – Official Gazette of the Republic of Poland. On 22 November 2018 the National Council of the Judiciary (the “NCJ”) decided not to recommend the applicants for the judicial posts (resolution no. 576/2018). The applicants appealed to the Supreme Court against the NCJ resolution. On 21 July 2020 the Chamber of Extraordinary Review and Public Affairs of the Supreme Court dismissed their appeals in one single ruling (case no. I No 50/19). The decision was notified to the applicants on 21 October 2020.

The applicants complain that their cases were examined by the Chamber of Extraordinary Review and Public Affairs of the Supreme Court which was not an “independent and impartial tribunal established by law” within the meaning of Article 6 § 1 of the Convention.

QUESTION TO THE PARTIES

Was the Chamber of Extraordinary Review and Public Affairs of the Supreme Court which dealt with the applicants’ cases an “independent and impartial tribunal established by law” as required by Article 6 § 1 of the Convention?

Reference is made to the Court’s judgments in Dolińska-Ficek and Ozimek v. Poland , nos. 49868/19 and 57511/19, 8 November 2021, §§ 283-359 and Guðmundur Andri Ástráðsson v. Iceland [GC], no. 26374/18, 1 December 2020, §§ 205-290.

APPENDIX

No.

Application no.

Case name

Lodged on

Applicant Year of Birth Place of Residence Nationality

Represented by

1.

21998/21

FrÄ…ckowiak-Mitura v. Poland

21/04/2021

Małgorzata FRĄCKOWIAK-MITURA 1971 Lębork Polish

Kinga Dagmara SIADLAK

2.

22918/21

Hetnarowicz-Sikora v. Poland

20/04/2021

Joanna HETNAROWICZ-SIKORA 1978 Kobylnica Polish

Kinga Dagmara SIADLAK

3.

24398/21

Odelski v. Poland

21/04/2021

Hubert ODELSKI 1971 Ustka Przewłoka Polish

Kinga Dagmara SIADLAK

4.

25545/21

Zielonka v. Poland

21/04/2021

Tomasz ZIELONKA 1973 SÅ‚upsk Polish

Kinga Dagmara SIADLAK

© European Union, https://eur-lex.europa.eu, 1998 - 2024
Active Products: EUCJ + ECHR Data Package + Citation Analytics • Documents in DB: 398107 • Paragraphs parsed: 43931842 • Citations processed 3409255