Lexploria - Legal research enhanced by smart algorithms
Lexploria beta Legal research enhanced by smart algorithms
Menu
Browsing history:

MANDEV AND OTHERS v. BULGARIA

Doc ref: 57002/11 • ECHR ID: 001-217578

Document date: May 10, 2022

  • Inbound citations: 0
  • Cited paragraphs: 0
  • Outbound citations: 2

MANDEV AND OTHERS v. BULGARIA

Doc ref: 57002/11 • ECHR ID: 001-217578

Document date: May 10, 2022

Cited paragraphs only

Published on 30 May 2022

FOURTH SECTION

Application no. 57002/11 Atanas Angelov MANDEV and Others against Bulgaria lodged on 24 August 2011 communicated on 10 May 2022

SUBJECT MATTER OF THE CASE

The application concerns the forfeiture of alleged proceeds of crime, in proceedings under the 2005 Forfeiture of Proceeds of Crime Act (described in Todorov and Others v. Bulgaria , nos. 50705/11 and 6 others, §§ 90-110, 13 July 2021). In 2005 the first applicant was convicted for extortion, which triggered forfeiture proceedings against him and the remaining applicants (his wife and parents). The proceedings ended on 25 February 2011. The national courts ordered the forfeiture of immoveable properties and sums of money, considering them proceeds of crime on the basis of the presumption contained in section 4(1) of the Forfeiture of Proceeds of Crime Act, after finding that the applicants had not proven sufficient lawful income. At different stages of the proceedings, the applicants were ordered to pay court fees in the total amount of 25,256 Bulgarian levs (the equivalent of 12,920 euros).

The applicants complain of the forfeiture of their assets, relying on Article 1 of Protocol No. 1 and Articles 6 § 1 and 13 of the Convention. Moreover, they complain under Article 6 § 1 of the Convention and Article 1 of Protocol No. 1 of having to pay the amount of court fees indicated above.

QUESTIONS TO THE PARTIES

1. Was the forfeiture of the applicants’ assets in compliance with the requirements of Article 1 of Protocol No. 1? In particular, did the domestic authorities reasonably establish that the assets at issue were the proceeds of crime (see Todorov and Others v. Bulgaria , nos. 50705/11 and 6 others, 13 July 2021)?

2. Were the court fees the applicants were ordered to pay in compliance with Article 1 of Protocol No. 1? In particular, did the obligation to pay such fees place an excessive burden on the applicants, or fundamentally interfere with their financial situation?

Appendix

List of Applicants

No.

Applicant’s Name

Year of birth

Nationality

Place of residence

1.Atanas Angelov MANDEV

1968Bulgarian

Sliven

2.Angel Ivanov MANDEV

1940Bulgarian

Sliven

3.Maria Atanasova MANDEVA

1943Bulgarian

Sliven

4.Vanya Mihaylova MANDEVA

1970Bulgarian

Sliven

© European Union, https://eur-lex.europa.eu, 1998 - 2024
Active Products: EUCJ + ECHR Data Package + Citation Analytics • Documents in DB: 398107 • Paragraphs parsed: 43931842 • Citations processed 3409255