Lexploria - Legal research enhanced by smart algorithms
Lexploria beta Legal research enhanced by smart algorithms
Menu
Browsing history:

Missaoui and Akhandaf v. Belgium (communicated case)

Doc ref: 54795/21 • ECHR ID: 002-13682

Document date: May 19, 2022

  • Inbound citations: 0
  • Cited paragraphs: 0
  • Outbound citations: 0

Missaoui and Akhandaf v. Belgium (communicated case)

Doc ref: 54795/21 • ECHR ID: 002-13682

Document date: May 19, 2022

Cited paragraphs only

Information Note on the Court’s case-law 263

June 2022

Missaoui and Akhandaf v. Belgium (communicated case) - 54795/21

Article 14

Discrimination

Ban on full body swimsuit (burkini) in municipal swimming pool: communicated

The applicants are two Muslim women complaining about the ban on wearing a full body swimsuit in a public swimming pool. Finding that the ban amounted to discrimination on grounds of religion, they applied to the courts in 2017 to have it set aside, in particular challenging the relevant municipal regulations. In 2020 their complaints were dismissed on appeal.

Communicated under Article 14 of the Convention taken in conjunction with Article 9.

(See also S.A.S. v. France [GC], no. 43835/11, 1 July 2014 ( legal summary ), Dakir v. Belgium , no. 4619/12, 11 July 2017 ( legal summary ), and OsmanoÄŸlu and KocabaÅŸ v. Switzerland (dec.), no. 29086/12, 10 January 2017 ( legal summary ))

© Council of Europe/European Court of Human Rights This summary by the Registry does not bind the Court.

Click here for the Case-Law Information Notes

© European Union, https://eur-lex.europa.eu, 1998 - 2026

LEXI

Lexploria AI Legal Assistant

Active Products: EUCJ + ECHR Data Package + Citation Analytics • Documents in DB: 401132 • Paragraphs parsed: 45279850 • Citations processed 3468846