Lexploria - Legal research enhanced by smart algorithms
Lexploria beta Legal research enhanced by smart algorithms
Menu
Browsing history:

CASE OF SERGEY ANTONOV AGAINST UKRAINE AND 2 OTHER CASES

Doc ref: 40512/13;36853/09;17278/18 • ECHR ID: 001-218697

Document date: June 30, 2022

  • Inbound citations: 0
  • Cited paragraphs: 0
  • Outbound citations: 0

CASE OF SERGEY ANTONOV AGAINST UKRAINE AND 2 OTHER CASES

Doc ref: 40512/13;36853/09;17278/18 • ECHR ID: 001-218697

Document date: June 30, 2022

Cited paragraphs only

Resolution CM/ResDH(2022)181

Execution of the judgments of the European Court of Human Rights

Three cases against Ukraine

(Adopted by the Committee of Ministers on 30 June 2022

at the 1438 th meeting of the Ministers' Deputies)

Application No.

Case

Judgment of

Final on

40512/13

SERGEY ANTONOV

22/10/2015

22/01/2016

36853/09

SERGEY SMIRNOV

18/12/2018

18/12/2018

17278/18

SOLOPOVA

27/06/2019

27/06/2019

The Committee of Ministers, under the terms of Article 46, paragraph 2, of the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms, which provides that the Committee supervises the execution of final judgments of the European Court of Human Rights (hereinafter “the Convention” and “the Court”);

Having regard to the final judgments transmitted by the Court to the Committee in these cases and to the violations established on account of lack of adequate medical assistance in detention, absence of an effective domestic remedy in respect of complaints regarding inadequate medical care in detention, monitoring of the applicant’s correspondence with entities not exempted from monitoring under domestic law and hindrances to the right to individual petition;

Recalling the respondent State’s obligation, under Article 46, paragraph 1, of the Convention, to abide by all final judgments in cases to which it has been a party and that this obligation entails, over and above the payment of any sums awarded by the Court, the adoption by the authorities of the respondent State, where required:

- of individual measures to put an end to violations established and erase their consequences so as to achieve as far as possible restitutio in integrum ; and

- of general measures preventing similar violations;

Having invited the government of the respondent State to inform the Committee of the measures taken to comply with the above-mentioned obligation;

Having examined the action plan provided by the government indicating the individual measures adopted to give effect to the judgments including the information provided regarding the payment of the just satisfaction awarded by the Court (see document DH-DD(2022)22

Considering that the question of individual measures was resolve, given that the just satisfaction awarded by the Court has been paid and the applicants are no longer in detention;

Recalling that the question of general measures required in response to the shortcomings found by the Court in these cases continues to be examined within the framework of the Isayev and Naydyon groups of cases and that the closure of these cases therefore in no way prejudges the Committee’s evaluation of the general measures required;

DECLARES that it has exercised its functions under Article 46, paragraph 2, of the Convention in these cases and

DECIDES to close the examination of these cases.

© European Union, https://eur-lex.europa.eu, 1998 - 2025

LEXI

Lexploria AI Legal Assistant

Active Products: EUCJ + ECHR Data Package + Citation Analytics • Documents in DB: 401132 • Paragraphs parsed: 45279850 • Citations processed 3468846