Browsing history:

↳
CASE OF ANHEUSER-BUSCH INC. v. PORTUGALJOINT DISSENTING OPINION OF JUDGES CAFLISCH AND CABRAL BARRETO
Judgment of the Court (Sixth Chamber) of 22 November 2017. European Commission v Bilbaína de Alquitranes, SA and Others.
Commission Regulation ( EEC ) No 109/92 of 17 January 1992 fixing the standard fee per farm return for the 1992 accounting year of the Farm Accountancy Data Network
Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 18 June 2009. Proceedings brought by Aberdeen Property Fininvest Alpha Oy.
Council Regulation (EEC) No 3762/83 of 19 December 1983 amending Regulation (EEC) No 3589/82 on common rules for imports of certain textile products originating in third countries
Commission Regulation (EEC) No 225/89 of 30 January 1989 fixing the import levies on milk and milk products
CASE OF ESTEMIROVA v. RUSSIAJOINT DISSENTING OPINION OF JUDGES DEDOV AND ZÃœND
Judgment of the Court (Third Chamber), 22 March 2012. Grünwald Logistik Service GmbH (GLS) v Hauptzollamt Hamburg-Stadt.
M.A. FAYED, A. FAYED AND S. FAYED v. the UNITED KINGDOMDISSENTING OPINION OF MR. B. MARXER
Judgment of the General Court (Fourth Chamber) of 7 September 2022. DD v European Union Agency for Fundamental Rights.

Search
document

Document text Analytics

Judgment of the General Court (Fourth Chamber) of 7 September 2022. DD v European Union Agency for Fundamental Rights.

• 62020TJ0470 • ECLI:EU:T:2022:511

Inbound citations: 0
•
Cited paragraphs: 0
•
Outbound citations: 0

Judgment of the General Court (Fourth Chamber) of 7 September 2022. DD v European Union Agency for Fundamental Rights.

• 62020TJ0470 • ECLI:EU:T:2022:511

Cited paragraphs only

© European Union, https://eur-lex.europa.eu, 1998 - 2026

LEXI

Lexploria AI Legal Assistant

Active Products: EUCJ + ECHR Data Package + Citation Analytics • Documents in DB: 401132 • Paragraphs parsed: 45279850 • Citations processed 3468846