Browsing history:

↳
CASE OF BURANDO HOLDING B.V. AND PORT INVEST v. THE NETHERLANDS
Commission Regulation (EEC) No 2661/80 of 17 October 1980 laying down detailed rules for applying the variable slaughter premium for sheep
Commission Regulation (EEC) No 454/92 of 26 February 1992 laying down quality standards for asparagus
CASE OF MANIC v. LITHUANIAJOINT DISSENTING OPINION OF JUDGE S SPANO AND KJØLBRO
Council Directive 96/98/EC of 20 December 1996 on marine equipment
COMMISSION REGULATION (EEC) No 1791/93 of 30 June 1993 amending Regulation (EEC) No 3664/91 laying down transitional measures for aromatized wines, aromatized wine-based drinks and aromatized wine-product cocktails
Commission Regulation (EEC) No 1003/90 of 20 April 1990 altering the import levies on products processed from cereals and rice
CASE OF JAKUB AND 109 OTHER CASES AGAINST THE SLOVAK REPUBLIC
CASE OF KAYA v. GERMANYCONCURRING OPINION OF JUDGE ROZAKIS
CASE OF R.C. v. SWEDENDISSENTING OPINION OF JUDGE FURA

Document text Analytics

Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 27 April 2006. Standesamt Stadt Niebüll.

C-96/04 • 62004CJ0096 • ECLI:EU:C:2006:254

Inbound citations: 19
•
Cited paragraphs: 4
•
Outbound citations: 10

At a glance

Citations by paragraph

Historical distribution of citations

Detailed analytics

Inbound citations

qo unique documents citing • gC citations total to q paragraphs

Outbound citations

nb unique documents cited • HH citations total

© European Union, https://eur-lex.europa.eu, 1998 - 2026

Active Products: EUCJ + ECHR Data Package + Citation Analytics • Documents in DB: 401132 • Paragraphs parsed: 45279850 • Citations processed 3468846