Browsing history:

↳
DOYEN SPORTS INVESTMENTS LIMITED v. PORTUGAL
CASE OF SIDABRAS AND DŽIAUTAS v. LITHUANIAPARTLY DISSENTING OPINION OF JUDGE LOUCAIDES
CASE OF SAADI v. ITALYCONCURRING OPINION OF JUDGE MYJER, JOINED BY JUDGE ZAGREBELSKY
Commission Regulation (EEC) No 3559/81 of 8 December 1981 on the classification of goods falling within subheading 85.15 A III b) 2 of the Common Customs Tariff
Commission Regulation (EEC) No 647/77 of 29 March 1977 fixing the import levies on white sugar and raw sugar
CASE OF OYAL v. TURKEYPARTLY CONCURRING AND PARTLY DISSENTING OPINION OF JUDGE SAJÓ
COMMISSION REGULATION (EEC) No 2743/93 of 5 October 1993 amending Regulation (EEC) No 1767/82 laying down detailed rules for applying specific import levies on certain milk products
Council Implementing Regulation (EU) 2017/150 of 27 January 2017 implementing Article 2(3) of Regulation (EC) No 2580/2001 on specific restrictive measures directed against certain persons and entities with a view to combating terrorism, and repealing Implementing Regulation (EU) 2016/1127
Judgment of the Court (Third Chamber) of 25 March 2021. Deutsche Telekom AG v European Commission.
CASES OF VATURI AND ZENTAR AGAINST FRANCE

Document text Analytics

Judgment of the Court of 6 June 1995. Ahmet Bozkurt v Staatssecretaris van Justitie.

C-434/93 • 61993CJ0434 • ECLI:EU:C:1995:168

Inbound citations: 53
•
Cited paragraphs: 15
•
Outbound citations: 90

At a glance

Citations by paragraph

Historical distribution of citations

Detailed analytics

Inbound citations

h9 unique documents citing • J1 citations total to oM paragraphs

Outbound citations

R unique documents cited • JC citations total

© European Union, https://eur-lex.europa.eu, 1998 - 2026

Active Products: EUCJ + ECHR Data Package + Citation Analytics • Documents in DB: 401132 • Paragraphs parsed: 45279850 • Citations processed 3468846