Kolesnikovich v. Russia
Doc ref: 44694/13 • ECHR ID: 002-10895
Document date: March 22, 2016
- 0 Inbound citations:
- •
- 0 Cited paragraphs:
- •
- 0 Outbound citations:
Information Note on the Court’s case-law 194
March 2016
Kolesnikovich v. Russia - 44694/13
Judgment 22.3.2016 [Section III]
Article 3
Degrading treatment
Inhuman treatment
Failure to perform Helicobacter pylori test and other shortcomings in treatment of detainee’s ulcer: violation
Facts – During his pre-trial detention and while serving a prison sentence, the applicant suffered from frequent ulcer recurren ce and other serious health conditions. He unsuccessfully sued the prison administration for inadequate medical treatment.
Law – Article 3: Even though the authorities had become promptly aware of the applicant’s health problems, he had been left without a ny medical supervision during the first two years of his detention, until his health had worsened to the extent that he could no longer take part in court hearings. His delayed admission to the prison hospital, combined with the failure to provide him with some of the required medication in order to, at least, relieve his severe stomach pain, was a serious shortcoming. The Court was not convinced that the authorities had properly assessed the complications of the applicant’s condition. His treatment had lac ked a strategy aimed at reducing the frequency of ulcer recurrence and was therefore patently ineffective. A major flaw in that respect was the failure to perform the Helicobacter pylori test.* Moreover, the authorities did not seem to have assessed the co mpatibility of the applicant’s treatment with nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs for his spinal problems with his ulcer disease, even though such medication could induce gastrointestinal bleeding and deterioration of the patient’s condition. All those sh ortcomings, taken cumulatively, amounted to inhuman and degrading treatment.
Conclusion : violation (unanimously).
The Court also found unanimously a violation of Article 13 of the Convention .
Article 41: EUR 15,000 in respect of non-pecuniary damage; claim in respect of pecuniary damage dismissed.
* The Court relied, inter alia , on the Maastricht IV/Florence Consensus report of 22 February 2012 on Management of H.pylori infection, according to which H.pylori was the key factor in peptic ulcer development and H.pylori eradication effectively achieved ulcer healing rates exceeding 90%.
© Council of Europe/European Court of Human Rights This summary by the Registry does not bind the Court.
Click here for the Case-Law Information Notes