Lexploria

FIFTH SECTION

Application no. 35857/06 Boris Borisovich YUDIN ag a inst Ukraine and 31 other applications (see list appended)

STATEMENT OF FACTS

A list of the applicants is set out in the Appendix.

A. The circumstances of the case

On 27 July 2002 the Air Force of Ukraine organised a military aviation show at the “Lviv” (“Sknyliv”) airdrome to commemorate an anniversary of the 14 th Air Force Unit. The celebration agenda included a static display of military airplanes and other equipment and a live aerobatics show by military pilots. Several thousand individuals, including the applicants and/or their close relatives, attended the event.

During the aerobatics performance, an airplane piloted by Colonels V.T. and Y.Y. fell and crashed into the static airplane display site, occupied by numerous spectators. Both pilots successfully ejected themselves before the airplane hit the ground. As a result of the crash, 77 persons, including relatives of some applicants, were killed, and 292 persons, including some applicants, were injured (see Appendix for details).

On the same day (27 July 2002) the military prosecutors ’ office instituted criminal proceedings to investigate the circumstances of the accident.

On various dates the applicants joined these proceedings as injured parties and civil claimants. Some applicants made unsuccessful attempts to negotiate an extra-judicial settlement with the State authorities. In particular, they solicited the same amount of compensation, which had been offered by Ukraine ex gratia to the Russian authorities for the deaths of the Russian nationals in an airplane crash of 4 October 2001. This airplane, which belonged to a Russian company, was suspected to have been accidentally shot by the Ukrainian military authorities. According to the terms of the settlement, Ukraine was to pay USD 200,000 (U.S. dollars) for each passenger killed to be distributed by the Russian authorities among his or her relatives.

On unspecified dates ten military officers were indicted of various acts and omissions leading to the accident.

In August 2004 criminal proceedings with respect to four defendants, in particular, the higher military staff, who had supervised the organisation of the show, were disjoined from the main set of proceedings. These defendants included Major-General V.S. (the Air Force Commander-in-Chief at the material time); Lieutenant-General O.V. (his deputy); Major-General V.A. (the deputy chief of the Air Force military training at the material time) and Lieutenant-General S.O. (the Chief of the 14 th Air Force Unit at the material time). The applicants were not informed of this decision.

In November 2004 the remaining six defendants, including the two pilots and the supporting land crew, were committed to stand trial before the Central Region Military Court of Appeal to act as a first-instance court.

On 23 May 2005 the Central Region Military Court of Appeal pronounced a judgment with respect to the two pilots and four other defendants. According to the court ’ s findings, the principal cause of the airplane crash was an incorrect performance by V.T. (the first pilot) of an aerobatics trick called “trunk”, which was neither envisaged by his mission order, nor practiced by him before the show. It was further found that the trick had been performed outside the designated aerobatics zone, which led to the falling of the airplane on the ground occupied by numerous spectators. The first pilot ’ s mistakes could have been corrected or the grave consequences of the accident could have been mitigated, were it not for the negligent performance on behalf of the second pilot Colonel Y.Y., and the land crew, including Major-General A.T. and Colonels Y.Ya. and A.L. In particular, the second pilot Y.Y. failed to correct the mistakes by the first pilot, despite having the technical ability to do so. Major-General A.T., a designated chief of flights during the show, and Colonel Y.Ya., acting dispatcher, failed to warn the pilots when they had quit the designated aerobatics zone or take any action guiding them back to a zone safe for the spectators. Finally, Colonel A.L., being the chief of the 14 th Air Force Unit ’ s flight security service, failed to put in place any specific prevention measures plan, aiming to ensure security of the spectators in the face of a pilot ’ s mistake or any other unexpected turn of events during the show.

As a result, the court found V.T., Y.Y., A.T. and Y.Ya. guilty of breach of flight rules within the meaning of Article 416 of the Criminal Code of Ukraine (“CCU”) and sentenced them to fourteen, eight, six and five years ’ imprisonment respectively. It further found A.L. guilty of having a negligent attitude towards military service within the meaning of Article 425 of the CCU and sentenced him to four years ’ imprisonment suspended on probation.

The sixth defendant, Colonel O. D., who coordinated V.T. ’ s and Y.Y. ’ s training flights, issued the mission order and procured the airplane for the show, was found to have performed his duties in good faith and acquitted.

The court further ruled on the applicants ’ civil claims, awarding them various sums in damages (see Appendix for details).

The applicants appealed in cassation against this judgment, complaining, in particular, that it was unfair to disjoin the proceedings against the higher military hierarchy from the main set; that punishments of some or all defendants were unfairly mild and that the sums awarded to the applicants in compensation were arbitrarily calculated and grossly inadequate. Some applicants also complained that the sums awarded to them were considerably less than those paid by Ukraine to the Russian authorities for the aircraft crash in October 2001.

On 2 March 2006 the Military Panel of the Supreme Court of Ukraine took the final decision rejecting the applicants ’ appeals.

It is not clear if and when the judgment awards were paid to the applicants.

On unspecified dates numerous applicants also joined the proceedings against the remaining four defendants and some of them lodged civil suits within their framework.

On another unspecified date the above four defendants were committed to stand trial on charges of having a negligent attitude towards military service, breach of regulations concerning flights and/or excess of power.

On 11 June 2008 the Central Region Military Court of Appeal, acting as a first-instance court, acquitted all defendants of the above charges. It noted that there were some shortcomings in the general organisation of the festivities (i.e., the designated aerobatics zone was quite small; the pilots conducted only one preparatory flight and it was at their home base, rather than above the Sknyliv airdrome; the grounds accommodating spectators were at the boundary of the designated aerobatics zone; etc.). The court further noted that, notwithstanding certain shortcomings in the general organisation of the show, since it had already been established by a final court judgment that the principal cause of the accident was the first pilot ’ s reckless conduct and technical mistakes, there was no direct causal link between the actions or omissions of the above defendants and the grave consequences, which followed.

The Prosecutors ’ Office and numerous injured parties, including some of the applicants, appealed in cassation against this verdict. They alleged, in particular, that the defendants ’ ‘ laissez-faire ’ attitude towards preparation of the festivities resulted in insufficient preparation of the pilots and the land crew for the performance; poor planning of the performance itself; lack of coordination between the officers engaged; and lack of public protection measures in the event of a potential pilot ’ s mistake or another unexpected turn of events during the show.

On 22 October 2008 the Military Panel of the Supreme Court of Ukraine upheld the acquittals. The applicants ’ civil claims were left without consideration.

B. Relevant domestic law

1. Criminal Code of Ukraine (“CCU”) of 2001

The relevant provisions of the Criminal Code of Ukraine read as follows:

Article 416. Breach of Regulations concerning Flights or Preparation to Them

“Breach of regulations concerning flights or preparation to them, as well as breach of regulations concerning exploitation of flying devices that resulted in a catastrophe or other grave consequences shall be punished by deprivation of liberty for the term from five to fifteen years.”

Article 424. Excess of authority or official powers by a military official

“1. Excess of authority or official powers by a military official, that is wilful actions that manifestly exceed the scope of rights or authority vested in this person ... where these acts cause any significant damage, shall be punishable by restraint of liberty for a term of two to five years, or imprisonment for the same term...

...

3. Any such act ... envisaged by paragraphs 1 or 2 of this Article, if it caused any grave consequences, shall be punishable by imprisonment for a term of five to ten years.”

Article 425. Negligent Attitude towards Military Service

“1. Negligent attitude of a military officer to his (her) service duties, in the event it caused significant damage shall be punished by a fine...

2. The same act, in the event it caused grave consequences, shall be punished by deprivation of liberty for the term from three to seven years.”

2. Law of Ukraine “On the Prosecutors ’ Office” No. 1789-XII of 5 November 1991

The provisions of the above act, insofar as relevant and as formulated at the material time, read as follows:

Article 46-1. Staff of the military prosecutors ’ office

“Military officers and investigators shall be appointed from among the citizens of Ukraine , who are officers in active military service or on reserve and have a university degree in law.

Military servicemen of the military prosecutors ’ offices shall in their activity be guided by the Law of Ukraine “On the Prosecutors ’ Office” and shall carry their service according to the Law of Ukraine “On Military Duty and Military Service” and other legislative acts of Ukraine, which establish legal and social safeguards, retirement, medical and other types of procurement, envisaged by law for persons of officers ’ rank in the Armed Forces of Ukraine.”

3. Law of Ukraine “On the Judiciary of Ukraine ” No.3018-III of 7 February 2002 repealed as of 7 July 2010

The relevant provisions of the above act, as formulated at the material time, read as follows:

Article 63. Peculiarities of the status of the military judges

1. Judges of the military courts shall be military servicemen and shall be on staff of the Armed Forces of Ukraine.

2. Military ranks to the judges of the military courts shall be assigned by the President of Ukraine upon application of the President of the Supreme Court of Ukraine, unless otherwise established by law...

3. A military judge shall not be engaged in performance of the duties of the military service other than adjudication of cases.

Article 122. Material and technical procurement of the courts

“1. Material and technical procurement of the local courts shall be vested in the State judicial administration... As regards the procurement for the military courts, the State judicial administration shall act in coordination with relevant establishments of the Ministry of Defence of Ukraine . Personnel of the military courts shall use all types of military equipment on par with personnel of the military units and establishments of the Ministry of Defence of Ukraine ....”

COMPLAINTS

The applicants complain under Article 2 of the Convention that the State authorities failed to take reasonable measures to protect their and/or their relatives ’ lives during the aviation show; that the State authorities were directly responsible for the applicants ’ injuries and/or deaths of their relatives; and that the investigation into the accident was ineffective. In particular, the relevant military authorities lacked independence. Furthermore, disjoining the proceedings against higher officers from the main set was aimed at exculpating them, rather than at the establishment of the true facts.

The applicants further complain that the State authorities ’ refusal to negotiate a friendly settlement constituted inhuman and degrading treatment within the meaning of Article 3 of the Convention.

The applicants, who sustained injuries, also complain that these injuries are indicative of inhuman and degrading treatment within the meaning of Article 3 of the Convention.

The applicants also complain under Article 6 § 1 of the Convention that criminal proceedings concerning the Sknyliv accident were inordinately lengthy and unfair. In particular, the judicial military authorities were neither independent, nor impartial, as they were largely funded by the Ministry of Defence and as judges had military ranks, which may have caused them to feel subordinate to the higher-ranking defendants. As a result, the higher military staff were spared responsibility for their numerous omissions and unlawful acts.

The applicants also complain under Articles 6 § 1 and 14 of the Convention and Article 1 of Protocol no. 1 that the compensation awarded to them for their sufferings was calculated arbitrarily and was much lower than that paid by Ukraine for the deaths of the Russian nationals in an airplane crash of 4 October 2001.

Finally, the applicants complain under Articles 6 and 13 of the Convention about lack of any means to speed up the consideration of their compensation claims.

QUESTIONS TO THE PARTIES

1. Was the risk to life faced by the applicants, who survived the Sknyliv accident, such as to attract applicability of Article 2 of the Convention (see e.g. Makaratzis v. Greece [GC], no. 50385/99, §§ 52-55, ECHR 2004 ‑ XI)?

2. Has the applicants ’ relatives ’ right to life, ensured by Article 2 of the Convention, been violated in the present case?

(a) Regard being had to the State ’ s positive obligation under Article 2 of the Convention to regulate hazardous activities so as to minimise risk to life (see Öneryıldız v. Turkey [GC], no. 48939/99, §§ 89-92, ECHR 2004 ‑ XII), did the authorities take all measures that could be reasonably expected from them in planning and organising the aerobatics show to ensure the applicants ’ and/or their relatives ’ safety?

(b) Given the proceedings brought against the pilots and other military officers and award of compensation to the applicants, has the State discharged its duty to identify and punish those responsible for the accident and to provide the applicants with appropriate redress?

In this connection, the Parties are additionally requested to inform the Court:

- whether, in addition to the criminal trial of ten military officers, any other proceedings (e.g. administrative, disciplinary, civil) were brought against any military or other public officials and/or entities and, if so, whether they resulted in imposition of any sanctions and

- whether any payments other than those awarded to the applicants within the framework of the aforementioned criminal proceedings and/or non-pecuniary redress (e.g. counselling, social assistance, etc.) have been provided to the applicants.

(c) Having regard to the procedural protection of the right to life (see paragraph 104 of Salman v. Turkey [GC], no. 21986/93, ECHR 2000-VII), was the investigation in the present case by the domestic authorities such as to meet the requirements of Article 2 of the Convention?

The Parties are invited, in particular, to comment on the role of the military prosecutors ’ office in the investigation and on whether the above authority and the military courts possessed requisite independence from the military authorities, including defendants in the proceedings.

3. Did the applicants have a fair hearing in the determination of their civil claims in accordance with Article 6 § 1 of the Convention? In particular, were the military tribunals, which dealt with their cases, independent and impartial, as required by Article 6 § 1 of the Convention?

4. Was the length of the criminal proceedings, in which the applicants acted as injured parties and civil claimants, in breach of the “reasonable time” requirement of Article 6 § 1 of the Convention?

The Parties are requested, in particular, to communicate the dates on which the applicants received their judgment awards.

5. Did the applicants have at their disposal an effective domestic remedy for their complaint under Article 6 concerning lengthy consideration of their claims for compensation, as required by Article 13 of the Convention?

APPENDIX

Application number/

date of lodging

Applicant ’ s name

Reason for complaint

Compensation claimed: pecuniary/non-pecuniary ( hryvnias )

Compensation awarded: pecuniary/non-pecuniary ( hryvnias )

35857/06

18.08.06

Yudin,

Boris Borisovich

Bodily injuries (collarbone fracture, cerebral contusion with haemorrhage, partial amnesia, epilepsy )

260/

300,000

260/

10,000

36727/06

31.08.06

Reshetilova,

Iryna Grygorivna

Bodily injuries (multiple burns)

25,000/

200,000

2,300/

5,000

Yegorov,

Viktor Mykhaylovych

Bodily injuries (compressed fractures of the vertebra, abrasions)

25,000/

300,000

1,300/

7,000

Bastrakov,

Nikita Sergiyovych

Bodily injuries (post-traumatic stress disorder, enuresis, lesser injuries such as abrasions)

0/

200,000

0/

10,000

37227/06

30.08.06

Kurylka,

Galyna Ivanivna

Bodily injuries (post-traumatic stress disorder)

1,000/

1,000,000

803/

3,000

32982/12

30.08.06

Belinska,

Liliya Bogdanivna

Bodily injuries (post-traumatic stress disorder)

3,375/

200,000

375/

5,000

32969/12

30.08.06

Budasov,

Viktor Volodymyrovych

Death of Budasova, Galyna Stepanivna, wife

0/

1,000,000

0/

40,000

Budasov,

Vitaliy Viktorovych

Death of Budasova, Galyna Stepanivna, mother

0/

200,000

0/

30,000

Dolynna,

Anastasiya Mykhaylivna

Death of Budasova, Galyna Stepanivna, daughter

0/

1,000,000

0/

10,000

Dolynnyy,

Roman Stepanovych

Death of Budasova, Galyna Stepanivna, sister

0/

200,000

0/

10,000

32894/12

30.08.06

Dudchenko,

O lga Ivanivna

Death of Dudchenko, Sergiy Petrovych, born in 1959 (husband) and Dudchenko, Maryana Sergiyivna, born in 1995 (daughter)

0/

2,000,000

0/

35,000

32821/12

30.08.06

Garasymiv,

Anatoliy Romanovych

Bodily injuries (cerebral concussion, multiple burns and abrasions)

880/

350,000

880/

5,000

Garasymiv, Volodymyr Anatoliyovych

Bodily injuries (post-traumatic stress disorder)

0/

500,000

0/

5,000

32628/12

30.08.06

Ivanov, Volodymyr Oleksiyovych

Death of Ivanov, Roman Volodymyrovych, born in 1978, son

0/

1,000,000

0/50,000

Ivanova, Nina Oleksandrivna

0/

1,000,000

0/50,000

32621/12

30.08.06

Khamyk, Sergiy Ivanovych

Bodily injuries (traumatic amputation of the left leg; bone fractures and wounds)

3,090/

1,000,000

0/

35,000

32604/12

30.08.06

Khramkov, Oleksiy Oleksiyovych

Death of Khramkova, Tamara Oleksiyivna, born in 1988, daughter

3,890/

1,000,000

3,890/

50,000

Khramkova, Yevgeniya Oleksiyivna

Death of Khramkova, Tamara Oleksiyivna, born in 1988, sister;

Bodily injuries (hematomas)

414/

300,000

414/

30,000

32597/12

30.08.06

Kolomiets, (Yatskiv) Olena Volodymyrivna

Death of Kolomiyets, Viktor Volodymyrovych, born in 1976, brother

2,000/1,000,000 joint family claim

1,000/100,000 joint award for family

Kolomiyets, Anastasiya Volodymyrivna

Death of Kolomiyets, Viktor Volodymyrovych, born in 1976, grandson

2,000/1,000,000 joint family claim

1,000/100,000 joint award for family

Kolomiyets, Volodymyr Fedorovych

Death of Kolomiyets, Viktor Volodymyrovych, born in 1976, son

2,000/1,000,000 joint family claim

1,000/100,000 joint award for family

32588/12

30.08.06

Konchakovska, Bronislava Yosypivna

Death of Konchakovskyy, Volodymyr Stepanovych, born in 1933 (husband) and Konchakovskyy, Volodymyr Volodymyrovych, born in 1970 (son)

8,000/

1,000,000

1,000/

30,000

Konchakovska, Lyudmyla Mykhaylivna

Death of Konchakovskyy, Volodymyr Stepanovych, born in 1933 (father-in-law) and Konchakovskyy, Volodymyr Volodymyrovych, born in 1970 (husband)

2,000/

1,500,000

1,000/

30,000

Konchakovskyy, Sergiy Volodymyrovych

Death of Konchakovskyy, Volodymyr Stepanovych, born in 1933 (father) and Konchakovskyy, (Volodymyr Volodymyrovych, born in 1970 (brother)

8,000/

500,000

1,000/

30,000

Kryshchenko, Lyubov Volodymyrivna

8,000/

500,000

1,000/

30,000

32586/12

30.08.06

Korenchuk, (Yufym) Olena Vasylivna

Death of Korenchuk, Taras Vasylyovych, born in 1992, brother

1,500/

100,000

1,000/

40,000

Korenchuk, Vasyl Mykolayovych

Death of Korenchuk, Taras Vasylyovych, born in 1992, son

3,600/

2,000,000

1,000/

50,000

32581/12

30.08.06

Koshulap, Khrystyna Viktorivna

Bodily injuries (complex hand injury)

2,664/

800,000

2,664/

10,000

32545/12

30.08.06

Makarov, Oleksandr Ivanovych

Death of Makarov, Volodymyr Ivanovych, born in 1972, brother

4,000/

500,000

0/

50,000

Makarova,

Ganna Viktorivna

Death of Makarov, Volodymyr Ivanovych, born in 1972, son

0/

500,000

0/

50,000

32514/12

30.08.06

Mikhno, Anastasiya Sergiyivna

Death of Mikhno, Sergiy Ivanovych, born in 1968 (father) and Mikhno,Tetyana Igorivna, born in 1976 (mother)

0/

2,000,000

0/

50,000

Mikhno,

Nina Vasylivna

Death of Mikhno, Sergiy Ivanovych, born in 1968 (son) and Mikhno, Tetyana Igorivna, born in 1976 (daughter-in-law)

0/

500,000

0/

50,000

33208/12

30.08.06

Motuzyuk,

Natalya Yosypivna

Death of Motuzyuk, Bogdan Volodymyrovych, born in 1974 (son) and Motuzyuk, Iryna Yevgenivna, born in 1978 (daughter-in-law)

0/

1,000,000

0/

40,000

Motuzyuk, Volodymyr Ivanovych

15,900/

1,000,000

15,900/

40,000

Motuzyuk,

Oksana Volodymyrivna

Death of Motuzyuk, Bogdan Volodymyrovych, born in 1974 (brother) and Motuzyuk, Iryna Yevgenivna, born in 1978 (sister-in-law)

0/

1,000,000

0/

40,000

33198/12

30.08.06

Mruz, Denys Volodymyrovych

Death of Mruz, Volodymyr Ivanovych, born in 1956, father

0/

1,000,000

0/

20,000

Mruz,

Galyna Vasylivna

Death of Mruz, Volodymyr Ivanovych, born in 1956, husband;

Bodily injuries (post-traumatic stress disorder)

0/

1,000,000

0/

20,000

Mruz, Oleksandr Ivanovych

Death of Mruz, Volodymyr Ivanovych, born in 1956, brother

0/

200,000

0/

10,000

33194/12

30.08.06

Omelchuk,

Ananiy Mykhaylovych

Death of Omelchuk, Viktor Ananiyovych, born in 1963 (son) and Omelchuk, Andriy Viktorovych, born in 1992 (grandson)

13,369/

1,000,000

13,369/

65,000

Omelchuk,

Nadiya Grygorivna

13,369/

1,000,000

0/

10,000

33183/12

30.08.06

Chyzho,

Ganna Andriyivna

Death of Onyshchak, Oleg Bogdanovych, born in 1977 (son-in-law); Onyshchak, Yuriy Bogdanovych, born in 1979 (Oleg ’ s brother); Onyshchak, Iryna Volodymyrivna, born in 1979 (daughter) and Onyshchak, Yaryna Olegivna, born in 2001 (granddaughter)

0/

1,000,000

0/

135,000

Chyzho, Volodymyr Mykolayovych

0/

1,000,000

0/

135,000

Onyshchak, Mariya Ivanivna

Death of Onyshchak, Oleg Bogdanovych, born in 1977 (son); Onyshchak, Yuriy Bogdanovych, born in 1979 (son); Onyshchak, Iryna Volodymyrivna, born in 1979 (daughter-in-law) and Onyshchak, Yaryna Olegivna, born in 2001 (granddaughter)

8,000/

1,000,000

2,000/

135,000

33176/12

30.08.06

Pavlovych, Nataliya Semenivna

Death of Pavlovych, Pavlo Volodymyrovych, born in 1954 (husband) and Pavlovych, Ruslan Pavlovych, born in 1993 (son)

15,300/

10,000,000

15,300/

40,000

Pavlovych Yaryna Pavlivna

Death of Pavlovych, Pavlo Volodymyrovych, born in 1954 (father) and Pavlovych, Ruslan Pavlovych, born in 1993 (brother)

0/

10,000,000

0/

40,000

33168/12

30.08.06

Prytulyak, Galyna Mykhaylivna

Death of Prytulyak, Sergiy Alimovych, born in 1978, son

0/

1,000,000

0/

100,000

Prytulyak, Oleksandr Alimovych

Death of Prytulyak, Sergiy Alimovych, born in 1978, brother

0/

300,000

0/

10,000

33164/12

30.08.06

Rud,

Valeriy Vitaliyovych

Death of Rud, Oleksandr Vitaliyovych, born in 1978, brother;

Bodily injuries (post-traumatic stress disorder, hematomas, other minor injuries)

770/

300,000

260/

24,000

Rud, Vitaliy Illich

Death of Rud, Oleksandr Vitaliyovych, born in 1978, son

30,000/

1,000,000

1,000/

24,000

Rud,

Yuriy Valeriyovych

Death of Rud, Oleksandr Vitaliyovych, born in 1978, uncle;

Bodily injuries (cerebral concussion, contusion of lungs and liver, fracture of fibs, shock)

7,930/

700,000

530/

24,000

Rud,

Zinoviya Kostyantynivna

Death of Rud, Oleksandr Vitaliyovych, born in 1978, son

0/

1,000,000

0/

24,000

33150/12

30.08.06

Ivanyuk,

Mariya Vasylivna

Death of Serbin, Volodymyr Markiyanovych, born in 1966 (son-in-law); Serbin, Rostyslav Volodymyrovych, born in 1996 (grandson) and Serbin, Yuriy Volodymyrovych, born in 1999 (grandson)

5,000/

295,000

0/

100,000

Serbin

Oleksandra Mykhaylivna

Death of Serbin, Volodymyr Markiyanovych, born in 1966 (husband); Serbin, Rostyslav Volodymyrovych, born in 1996 (son) and Serbin, Yuriy Volodymyrovych, born in 1999 (son)

0/

1,000,000

0/

100,000

33145/12

30.08.06

Shevchuk, Anatoliy Mykolayovych

Bodily injuries (post-traumatic stress disorder, stutter)

0/

200,000

0/

6,000

Shevchuk, Andriy Anatoliyovych

Bodily injuries (post-traumatic stress disorder)

0/

200,000

0/10,000

33140/12

30.08.06

Dushenko,

Ivan Blazheyevych

Death of Shynal, Ganna Vasylivna, born in 1961 (daughter) and Shynal, Yaroslav Yaroslavovych, born in 1981 (grandson)

0/

500,000

0/

30,000

Dushenko Olena Yosypivna

0/

500,000

0/

30,000

Shynal (Soltys), Iryna Yaroslavivna

Death of Shynal, Ganna Vasylivna, born in 1961 (mother) and Shynal, Yaroslav Yaroslavovych, born in 1981 (brother)

0/

500,000

0/

30,000

Shynal (Gladka), Galyna Yaroslavivna

0/

50,000

0/

30,000

Shynal,

Yaroslav Ivanovych

Death of Shynal, Ganna Vasylivna, born in 1961 (wife) and Shynal, Yaroslav Yaroslavovych, born in 1981 (son)

580/

500,000

580/

30,000

33103/12

30.08.06

Sivanych, Nataliya Yaroslavivna

Bodily injuries (cerebral concussion, bone fractures, wound)

200/

300,000

200/

10,000

33094/12

30.08.06

Stupets, Lyubov Grygorivna

Bodily injuries (clavicular joint rupture)

0/

500,000

0/

10,000

33047/12

30.08.06

Gitaylo, Andriy Yuriyovych

Death of Tyman, Nataliya Yuriyivna, born in 1975 (sister) and Tyman, Oleg Ivanovych, born in 1993 (nephew)

0/

1,000,000

0/

35,000

Gitalylo Valentyna Mykolayivna

Death of Tyman, Nataliya Yuriyivna, born in 1975 (daugther) and Tyman, Oleg Ivanovych, born in 1993 (grandson)

0/

1,000,000

0/

35,000

Gitaylo Yuriy Ivanovych

0/

500,000

0/

35,000

Tyman,

Ganna Vasylivna

Death of Tyman, Nataliya Yuriyivna, born in 1975 (daughter-in-law) and Tyman, Oleg Ivanovych, born in 1993 (grandson)

0/

1,000,000

0/

35,000

Tyman,

Ivan Vasylyovych

Death of Tyman, Nataliya Yuriyivna, born in 1975 (wife) and Tyman, Oleg Ivanovych, born in 1993 (son)

0/

2,000,000

0/

35,000

33222/12

30.08.06

Vayda, Stefaniya Mykolayivna

Death of Vayda, Oleg Yaroslavovych, born in 1978, grandson

0/

100,000

0/

20,000

Vayda, Mykhaylo Dmytrovych

0/

50,000

0/

20,000

Krupa,

Olga Grygorivna

0/

50,000

0/

20,000

Vayda, Tetyana Yaroslavivna

Death of Vayda, Oleg Yaroslavovych, born in 1978, brother

0/

100,000

0/

20,000

Vayda, Yaroslav Mykhaylovych

Death of Vayda, Oleg Yaroslavovych, born in 1978, son;

Bodily injuries (leg wound and muscle injury; bruises, abrasions)

7,570/

500,000

7,570/

20,000

32998/12

30.08.06

Veselov, Dmytro Vyacheslavovych

Death of Veselova, Nina Vyacheslavivna, born in 1982, sister

0/

100,000

0/

20,000

Veselov, Vyacheslav Oleksandrovych

Death of Veselova Nina Vyacheslavivna, born in 1982, daughter

0/

100,000

0/

20,000

Veselova, Tetyana Volodymyrivna

0/

100,000

0/

20,000

32995/12

30.08.06

Tymoshenko, Tetyana Anatoliyivna

Death of Yakymenko, Yevgeniya Sergiyivna, born in 1987, daughter

3,951/

1,000,000

3,951/

100,000

Menu

YUDIN v. UKRAINE and 31 other applications

YUDIN v. UKRAINE and 31 other applications

LEXI