Browsing history:

↳
CASE OF AKSAKAL v. TURKEY
Commission Regulation (EEC) No 2596/93 of 22 September 1993 amending Regulations (EEC) No 131/92, (EEC) No 1695/92 and (EEC) No 1696/92 concerning common detailed rules for implementation of the specific arrangements for the supply of certain agricultural products to the French overseas departments, the Canary Islands, the Azores and Madeira
CASE OF SOLAROVA AND OTHERS v. SLOVAKIA
CASE OF PAPLAUSKIENĖ v. LITHUANIA
CASE OF GIRDAUSKAS, MEILUS, JAKUMAS AND KUVIKAS AGAINST LITHUANIA
Commission Regulation (EC) No 194/2005 of 3 February 2005 fixing the export refunds on cereals and on wheat or rye flour, groats and meal
Commission Regulation (EC) No 1949/2003 of 3 November 2003 amending Annex I to Council Regulation (EEC) No 2658/87 on the tariff and statistical nomenclature and on the Common Customs Tariff
CASE OF S.M. AGAINST CROATIA
CASE OF VAN RAALTE v. THE NETHERLANDSPARTLY DISSENTING OPINION OF JUDGE FOIGHEL
ÇİÇEK AND OTHERS v. TURKEY

Document text Analytics

VEITS v. ESTONIA

Doc ref: 12951/11 • ECHR ID: 001-116834

Document date: January 31, 2013

Inbound citations: 0
•
Cited paragraphs: 0
•
Outbound citations: 3

At a glance

Citations by paragraph

Historical distribution of citations

Detailed analytics

Outbound citations

4 unique documents cited • F citations total

© European Union, https://eur-lex.europa.eu, 1998 - 2025

Active Products: EUCJ + ECHR Data Package + Citation Analytics • Documents in DB: 400211 • Paragraphs parsed: 44892118 • Citations processed 3448707