Lexploria - Legal research enhanced by smart algorithms
Lexploria beta Legal research enhanced by smart algorithms
Menu
Browsing history:

STICHTING OSTADE BLADE AND KALLENBERG v. THE NETHERLANDS

Doc ref: 8406/06 • ECHR ID: 001-117026

Document date: February 5, 2013

  • Inbound citations: 0
  • Cited paragraphs: 0
  • Outbound citations: 1

STICHTING OSTADE BLADE AND KALLENBERG v. THE NETHERLANDS

Doc ref: 8406/06 • ECHR ID: 001-117026

Document date: February 5, 2013

Cited paragraphs only

THIRD SECTION

Application no . 8406/06 STICHTING OSTADE BLADE and F.J. KALLENBERG against the Netherlands lodged on 1 March 2006

The facts and complaints in this case have been summarised in the Court ’ s decision on admissibility, which is available in HUDOC.

QUESTIONS TO THE PARTIES

1. Given that the domestic courts acknowledged violations of the applicant foundation ’ s rights under Articles 8 and 10 of the Convention in relation to the search – aiming to find links between the organisation that claimed responsibility for the bomb attack and the magazine –, can the applicant foundation still claim to be a “victim” for purposes of Article 34 of the Convention?

2. In the affirmative, has the search – aiming to find the letter of the organisation that claimed responsibility for the bomb attack of 16 April 1996 – interfered with the applicant foundation ’ s freedom of expression, within the meaning of Article 10 § 1 of the Convention?

3. If so, was that interference necessary in terms of Article 10 § 2?

© European Union, https://eur-lex.europa.eu, 1998 - 2024
Active Products: EUCJ + ECHR Data Package + Citation Analytics • Documents in DB: 398107 • Paragraphs parsed: 43931842 • Citations processed 3409255