Lexploria - Legal research enhanced by smart algorithms
Lexploria beta Legal research enhanced by smart algorithms
Menu
Browsing history:

ADORISIO AND OTHERS v. THE NETHERLANDS and 2 other applications

Doc ref: 47315/13;48490/13;49016/13 • ECHR ID: 001-140897

Document date: January 14, 2014

  • Inbound citations: 0
  • Cited paragraphs: 0
  • Outbound citations: 1

ADORISIO AND OTHERS v. THE NETHERLANDS and 2 other applications

Doc ref: 47315/13;48490/13;49016/13 • ECHR ID: 001-140897

Document date: January 14, 2014

Cited paragraphs only

Communicated on 14 January 2014

THIRD SECTION

Application no . 47315/13 Stefania ADORISIO and others against the Netherlands lodged on 10 July 2013

The facts and complaints in this case have been summarised in the Court ’ s decision, which is available in HUDOC.

QUESTIONS

I. Have the effective domestic remedies been exhausted by all applicants, as required by Article 35 § 1 of the Convention?

II. Did the applicants have a fair hearing in the determination of their civil rights and obligations, in accordance with Article 6 § 1 of the Convention?

In particular,

1) did the applicants have sufficient time

a) to lodge and prepare their appeals;

b) to prepare their response to the Minister ’ s written statement of defence ?

2) did the lack of access to the reports by Ernst & Young and by Cushman & Wakefield alleged by the applicants render the proceedings unfair?

© European Union, https://eur-lex.europa.eu, 1998 - 2024
Active Products: EUCJ + ECHR Data Package + Citation Analytics • Documents in DB: 398107 • Paragraphs parsed: 43931842 • Citations processed 3409255