Lexploria - Legal research enhanced by smart algorithms
Lexploria beta Legal research enhanced by smart algorithms
Menu
Browsing history:

IBRAGIMOV v. SLOVAKIA

Doc ref: 65916/10 • ECHR ID: 001-145296

Document date: June 3, 2014

  • Inbound citations: 0
  • Cited paragraphs: 0
  • Outbound citations: 2

IBRAGIMOV v. SLOVAKIA

Doc ref: 65916/10 • ECHR ID: 001-145296

Document date: June 3, 2014

Cited paragraphs only

Communicated on 3 June 2014

THIRD SECTION

Application no . 65916/10 Ali Nurdinovich IBRAGIMOV against Slovakia lodged on 15 November 2010

The facts and complaints in this case have been summarised in the Court ’ s decision, which is available in HUDOC.

QUESTION

Did the applicant have at his disposal an effective domestic remedy for his complaint under Article 3, as required by Article 13 of the Convention? In particular, has the renewed asylum request of the applicant met the criteria of quality, speediness and suspensive effect as required by Article 13 of the Convention in similar cases (see also the recapitulation of the relevant case-law in A.C. and Others v. Spain , no. 6528/11, §§ 87-89, 22 April 2014, with further references)?

© European Union, https://eur-lex.europa.eu, 1998 - 2024
Active Products: EUCJ + ECHR Data Package + Citation Analytics • Documents in DB: 398107 • Paragraphs parsed: 43931842 • Citations processed 3409255